Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 13, 2026
The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
Computer-navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: no difference in implant survival at 15-year
Giovanni Longo1, Giacomo Pacchiarotti2, Carmela Pizzigallo3
1Department of Anatomy, Histology, Legal Medicine, and Orthopaedics, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. giovanni.longo1995@gmail.com.
Introduction:
The introduction of computer-assisted navigation (CAS) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aimed to improve prosthetic alignment and potentially enhance long-term implant survival. However, the actual clinical benefit beyond 10 years remains debated.
Materials And Methods:
Retrospective comparative study with up to 15-16 years of follow-up, including patients undergoing TKA using either a conventional (CONV) or computer-navigated (NAV) technique. The primary outcome was implant survival (absence of revision for any cause). Secondary outcomes were functional scores: Knee Society Score (KSS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC).
Results:
Fifteen-year implant survival was 70.5% (CONV) vs. 73.4% (NAV) (p > 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found in functional outcomes. Mortality unrelated to the prosthesis was high in both groups.
Conclusions:
At 15 years, the navigated technique did not demonstrate significant advantages over the conventional approach in terms of implant survival or functional outcomes. Larger prospective studies are required to confirm these findings.
