Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Measuring Influenza Neutralizing Antibody Responses to AH3N2 Viruses in Human Sera by Microneutralization Assays Using MDCK-SIAT1 Cells
Published on: November 22, 2017
Estimating population immunity against serotype-two poliomyelitis from the inactivated polio vaccine in routine
Elizabeth J Gray1, Laura V Cooper1, Alejandro Ramirez Gonzalez2
1MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Background:
To mitigate the risk of outbreaks of serotype 2 poliomyelitis after withdrawal of this serotype from oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) in 2016, inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) was introduced into the routine immunization (RI) programmes of all countries using OPV. Since 2022, WHO has recommended a 2-dose schedule, with a first dose at 14 weeks of age followed by a second dose at least 4 months later (e.g., 14-39 week schedule), although an earlier schedule may be adopted, despite lower immunogenicity, if vaccine coverage is low at older ages.
Methods And Findings:
We combined published data on type-2 IPV seroconversion with age, national RI coverage estimates, dose introduction dates, and country-specific schedules using a cohort model of population immunity to estimate IPV-induced immunity from 2024-2031 for 112 countries using either one or two doses of IPV. We projected immunity for current, 6-14, and 14-39 week schedules to find the optimal schedule and estimate the impact of interventions such as schedule changes and catch-ups. Under current schedules, estimated median serotype 2 population immunity in 2025 among children under five years of age is at 61% (IQR: 52%, 72%), rising to 71% (IQR: 57%, 80%) in 2031. The later 14-39 week schedule was optimal in all countries, with potential for the median immunity to rise to 78% (IQR: 66%, 85%) by 2031 if adopted by all countries in 2026. Eight countries would still have <50% immunity, rising to 65%-72% if catch-up campaigns with 80% coverage were implemented in 2030. The work is limited by the fact that IPV provides only a partial picture of total immunity where there has been emergency type-2 OPV use. Furthermore, national estimates may mask subnational coverage differences and pockets of extremely low immunity.
Conclusions:
Under these estimates, IPV schedules and coverage are suboptimal in many countries. Those with a single dose should introduce a second on the 14-39 week schedule; those on early schedules would benefit from adopting the 14-39 week schedule. IPV catch-up campaigns are recommended where RI coverage is low.
Related Concept Videos
Vaccinations
Immunological Memory
What is Immunological Memory?
Immunological memory is an integral function of the immune system that allows it to recognize and react more rapidly and effectively to pathogens previously encountered. This feature...
Infectious Diseases and Their Occurrence
Vaccines
Active versus Passive Immunity
Active Immunity
Active immunity refers to the resistance one develops...

