Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
Different Types of Aortic Valve Stenosis in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Kimberley I Hemelrijk1, Hugo M Aarts1,2, Gijs M Broeze1
1Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Insights
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) outcomes vary by aortic stenosis (AS) type. One-year mortality was higher for low-gradient AS with impaired ejection fraction, but similar for other discordant AS types compared to high-gradient AS.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a standard treatment for high-gradient aortic stenosis (AS).
- Limited data exist on TAVR outcomes for patients with discordant AS.
- This study analyzes TAVR outcomes across different AS classifications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing TAVR with various types of AS.
- To compare TAVR results between discordant and concordant high-gradient AS.
- To identify specific AS subgroups associated with different TAVR prognoses.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the CENTER2 patient-level database (n=15,233) of TAVR procedures.
- Classification of patients into four AS subgroups: low-gradient AS with preserved or impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), discordant high-gradient AS, and concordant high-gradient AS.
- Comparison of 1-year mortality and major bleeding rates across AS subgroups.
Main Results:
- 17.9% of TAVR patients had low-gradient AS, and 0.9% had discordant high-gradient AS.
- No significant difference in 1-year mortality between discordant AS and concordant high-gradient AS (13.1% vs. 11.9%, p=0.08).
- Higher 1-year mortality in low-gradient AS with impaired LVEF (15.9%) versus concordant high-gradient AS (11.9%, p=0.01).
- Concordant high-gradient AS had higher major bleeding rates (6.7%) compared to both low-gradient AS subgroups (4.0-5.4%, p<0.001 and p=0.04).
Conclusions:
- Discordant AS, excluding low-gradient AS with impaired LVEF, shows similar 1-year mortality to concordant high-gradient AS after TAVR.
- Low-gradient AS with impaired LVEF is associated with increased 1-year mortality post-TAVR.
- These findings refine risk stratification for TAVR patients with varied AS presentations.
Background:
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an effective treatment in patients with "classical" concordant high-gradient aortic stenosis (AS). However, data on outcomes in patients with discordant AS are scarce. Our study aims to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing TAVR with different types of AS.
Methods:
The Cerebrovascular Events in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation 2 (CENTER2) study is a patient-level database including 25,771 patients who underwent TAVR, of whom 15,233 were included in this analysis. Four AS subgroups were identified, and patients were classified as discordant AS (low-gradient AS with preserved or impaired left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] or discordant high-gradient AS) or concordant high-gradient AS.
Results:
A total of 15,233 patients underwent TAVR. The mean age was 81.5 ± 6.8 years, 56% were women, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality was 4.8% (interquartile range [IQR] 3.0-8.0%). Of these, 2731 (17.9%) patients had low-gradient AS with preserved or impaired LVEF, 138 (0.9%) discordant high-gradient AS, and 12,364 (81.2%) concordant high-gradient AS. There was no difference in 1-year mortality between discordant AS and concordant high-gradient AS (13.1 vs. 11.9%, adjusted hazard ratio 1.19, p = 0.08). One-year mortality rates was higher in low-gradient AS with impaired LVEF compared to concordant high-gradient AS (15.9 vs. 11.9%, adjusted hazard ratio 1.43, p = 0.01). Patients with concordant high-gradient AS had higher major bleeding rates (6.7%) compared to both low-gradient AS with impaired LVEF (4.0%) and preserved LVEF (5.4%) (p < 0.001 and p = 0.04).
Conclusions:
Nearly 20% of patients undergoing TAVR had discordant AS. One-year mortality was higher in low-gradient AS with impaired LVEF, whereas outcomes were similar among low-gradient with preserved LVEF, discordant high-gradient, and concordant high-gradient AS.
More Related Videos
12:17Full-root Aortic Valve Replacement by Stentless Aortic Xenografts in Patients with Small Aortic Roots
Published on: May 21, 2017
05:31Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement from Autologous Pericardium with a Self-Expandable Nitinol Stent in an Adult Sheep Model
Published on: June 8, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction