Development and temporal validation of an interpretable point score for in-hospital mortality in CLL/SLL using the

Xiaoyi Zhang1, Jean Bustamante1, Heloi Stefani1

  • 1Jacobi Medical Center, Department of Hematology/Oncology, Bronx, NY,USA.

Leukemia Research
|March 22, 2026
PubMed

Insights

A new bedside tool predicts in-hospital mortality for chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) patients. This interpretable score aids acute care decisions, matching machine learning performance without the complexity.

Area of Science:

  • Hematology
  • Oncology
  • Medical Informatics

Background:

  • In-hospital mortality for chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) patients is approximately 6%.
  • A validated, transparent bedside tool for acute care guidance is currently lacking for CLL/SLL patients.
  • Routine administrative data offers a potential source for developing predictive mortality models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and benchmark interpretable mortality prediction models for CLL/SLL patients.
  • To utilize routine administrative data for creating a bedside tool for acute care.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 117,765 CLL/SLL admissions from the U.S. National Inpatient Sample (2016-2022).
  • Inclusion of 59 ICD-10 predictors (52 comorbidities, 7 acute complications).
  • Application of regularized logistic regression (ridge, LASSO) and machine learning models, with temporal validation.

Main Results:

  • Crude in-hospital mortality was 5.8%.
  • Regularized logistic regression models (A, B, C) demonstrated strong discrimination (AUROC 0.842-0.851) and calibration.
  • A 23-item score (Model C) achieved an AUROC of 0.842, with mortality ranging from <1% to ~22% across quartiles.
  • Models showed equitable performance across 23 subgroups (AUROC ≥ 0.75) and provided net benefit in decision curves.

Conclusions:

  • Regularized logistic regression provides an equitable, well-calibrated CLL/SLL mortality score comparable to complex machine learning models.
  • The 23-item, non-negative score is deployable for triage, offering interpretability and practical utility.
  • Marginal performance gains from complex machine learning may not outweigh the benefits of simpler, interpretable models for acute care.

Related Concept Videos