Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 28, 2026

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
Published on: May 19, 2022
Visualizing the US News & World Report Prostate Cancer Surgery Rating: Developing a Coherent Cohort
Benjamin D Pollock1, Stephanie S Anderson2, Elizabeth Pickering3
1Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Introduction:
Hospital quality leaders and clinicians in urology receive conflicting signals from hospital rankings, such as the US News & World Report (USNWR), which reports prostatectomy patients to target for quality improvement. Our objective was to develop a clinically coherent cohort definition for radical prostatectomy spanning inpatient and outpatient settings and to assess overlap with USNWR prostate cancer surgery cohorts. This is a cross-sectional, multisite study of all consecutive radical prostatectomies performed within a large, integrated US health system in 2024.
Methods:
We created an institutional definition of prostate cancer surgery inclusive of inpatient and outpatient procedures across all payers, requiring an ICD (International Classification of Diseases)-10 diagnosis code for prostate cancer (C61) plus a procedural code for radical prostatectomy (Common Procedural Terminology 55810, 55812, 55815, 55840, 55842, 55845, or 55866, or ICD-10 procedure codes with clinical confirmation). We then reconstructed the 3 USNWR prostate cancer surgery cohorts: (1) outpatient volume, (2) outpatient potentially preventable complications, and (3) inpatient measures. Our main outcome was percent agreement between the institutional prostatectomy cohort and each USNWR comparator cohort.
Results:
Only 716/1591 (45%) radical prostatectomies performed at our institution were captured in at least 1 USNWR definition, 613/1591 (39%) were captured by the USNWR potentially preventable outpatient complications definition, and 97 (6.1%) were captured by the inpatient outcomes definition.
Conclusions:
USNWR prostatectomy cohorts capture less than half of clinically relevant cases. More inclusive, clinically coherent definitions-such as our institutional cohort-are needed to reliably benchmark hospital performance in radical prostatectomy.

