Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026
Cooling or Warming the Esophagus to Reduce Esophageal Injury During Left Atrial Ablation in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: March 15, 2020
Hemolysis and Renal Outcomes After Pulsed Field Versus Thermal Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis
Cesar Erazo1, Frans Serpa2, Gabriel Cavalcante Lima Chagas1
1Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Purpose:
Evaluate the comparative risk of hemolysis and acute kidney injury (AKI) with pulsed field ablation (PFA) versus thermal ablation (TA) for atrial fibrillation.
Methods:
Databases were searched through June 2025 for comparative studies reporting hemolysis markers or renal outcomes. Random-effects models estimated risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs).
Results:
Eight studies (n = 4307) were included. Compared with TA, PFA was not associated with a statistically significant increase in AKI (RR 2.00, 95% CI 0.5-7.9) or change in creatinine (MD 0.02 mg/dL, p = 0.10). PFA was associated with higher LDH (MD +72 U/L p < 0.001) and lower haptoglobin (MD -0.60 g/L p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
PFA may be associated with greater biochemical hemolysis than TA; however, no statistically significant difference in AKI or post-procedural creatinine was observed in pooled analyses.
