Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 31, 2026

Therapy Interventions for Upper Limb Amputees Undergoing Selective Nerve Transfers
Published on: October 29, 2021
References values and standardized testing protocols for performance-based and patient-reported outcome measures
Matthew McGuire1, Sara Nataletti1,2, Rachel Maronati1
1Max Näder Center for Rehabilitation Technologies and Outcomes Research, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, United States.
This study provides standardized procedures and reference values for outcome measures in individuals with lower limb amputation (LLA). These benchmarks aid rehabilitation, prosthetic prescription, and treatment evaluation for better prosthetic care.
Area of Science:
- Rehabilitation Medicine
- Prosthetics and Orthotics
- Clinical Outcomes Research
Background:
- Standardized outcome measures and reference data are crucial for guiding rehabilitation and prosthetic prescription in lower limb amputation (LLA).
- Existing studies often lack population-specific reference values and detailed testing protocols for LLA outcome measures.
- This gap hinders consistent application in clinical practice and research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe standardized administration procedures for commonly used outcome measures in adults with LLA.
- To present population-specific reference values for these measures, categorized by functional K-level and amputation level.
- To enhance consistency and comparability in clinical and research applications for LLA.
Main Methods:
- Data collected from 58 adults with unilateral or bilateral transtibial or transfemoral amputation at three medical centers.
- Participants used a definitive prosthesis for at least 6 months and were classified at K2 level or higher.
- Included 8 performance-based and 11 patient-reported outcome measures.
Main Results:
- Reference values presented by K-level and amputation level (unilateral transtibial, transfemoral, bilateral).
- Observed discrepancies with prior studies, potentially due to methodological and demographic variations.
- 10 Meter Walk Test speeds were up to 31% faster than previous studies, attributed to track length and calculation differences.
Conclusions:
- The study provides standardized guidelines and reference values for LLA outcome measures, supporting evidence-based prosthetic care.
- These benchmarks offer clinically relevant context for individual performance and goal setting, despite limitations in sample size for formal normative values.
- Promotes methodological transparency and improves comparability across studies in LLA rehabilitation and research.
More Related Videos
03:53Author Spotlight: Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) Surgery in Postamputation Pain Management
Published on: March 15, 2024
05:28Author Spotlight: Enhancing Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Through Advanced Robotic and Neuromodulation Technologies
Published on: October 11, 2024