Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 10, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
Geographical-XGBoost and SHAP reveal ecosystem service supply-demand responses to landscape patterns in karst regions
Yurong Han1, Jiayi Yin2, Dayun Zhu2
1School of Karst Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, 550001, China; State Engineering Technology Institute for Karst Desertification Control, Guiyang, 550001, China; State Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-Ecosystems, College of Ecology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Abstract:
Human activities influence landscape pattern (LP) change and, in turn, regulate the supply and demand of ecosystem services (ESs), which is particularly important in ecologically fragile karst regions. Focusing on Guanling County, we applied the G-XGBoost model integrated with the SHAP interpretation framework to quantify the spatiotemporal distribution patterns and supply-demand imbalances of landscape patterns and ESs in the region from 2000 to 2020. This approach identified key influencing factors, their contributions, and interactions, which also revealed spatial heterogeneity in the intensity of these impacts. Results show that (1) landscape fragmentation generally slowed, landscape heterogeneity decreased while aggregation increased, and construction land expansion was associated with more complex patch shapes. (2) All five ESs exhibit persistent spatial mismatches, with persistent habitat quality deficits, sustained carbon sequestration surplus, a tendency toward balance for soil conservation in some units, and urbanization-related shifts for grain production and annual water yield. (3) Landscape pattern indices contributed more than 50% to ES supply, with the largest patch index and landscape shape index playing dominant roles, whereas ES demand was mainly explained by socio-economic factors, except for soil conservation demand. (4) The G-XGBoost model yields detailed spatial evidence to inform zoning-based management. Accordingly, we propose targeted planning strategies: in supply-sensitive areas, priority should be given to conserving large natural patches and restricting infrastructure-driven fragmentation; while in high-demand zones, key interventions include controlling construction footprints, enhancing green-blue infrastructure, and exploring cross-jurisdictional ecological compensation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Levels of Use of a GIS
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Ecological Niches
Soil Microbial Ecology
The Soil Ecosystem
Response Surface Methodology
The process of RSM involves several key steps:

