Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 10, 2026

Author Spotlight: Accelerating Diagnostic Accuracy with Direct Identification of Gram-Negatives from Blood Culture Bottles
Published on: May 24, 2024
Reliability of the E-test and VITEK 2 Compact for Tigecycline Susceptibility Testing in Clinical Acinetobacter
Amresh Pati1, Bilal Ahmad Malik2, Kavita Gupta3
1Microbiology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Background:
The growing incidence of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (MDR AB) has left very limited therapeutic options. Tigecycline, the first antibiotic in the glycylcycline class, is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections and complicated skin and skin structure infections. This is one of the few last-resort options for infections caused by MDR AB. However, there is a lack of officially available breakpoints for Acinetobacter baumannii against tigecycline.
Objective:
This study aims to determine the tigecycline susceptibility of clinical A. baumannii isolates by broth microdilution (BMD), E-test, and VITEK 2 Compact, and to evaluate the performance of E-test and VITEK 2 Compact against BMD as the reference standard.
Methodologies:
A total of 150 clinical isolates of A. baumannii from sputum, blood, urine, pus, and sterile body fluids identified by VITEK 2 Compact from May 2019 to June 2021 were included in this study. Tigecycline susceptibility was determined by BMD, E-test (minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC): 0.016-256 µg/mL), and VITEK 2 Compact, with MICs interpreted using EUCAST (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing) 2020 Enterobacterales breakpoints.
Result:
The proportion of isolates categorized as susceptible by BMD was 90.67%, with MIC50 as 0.125 µg/mL, whereas MIC50 was higher for E-test and VITEK 2 Compact, having values of 0.75 µg/mL and 1 µg/mL, respectively. MIC90 was found to be 0.5 µg/mL in BMD, whereas higher values of 1 µg/mL and 4 µg/mL were found in E-test and VITEK 2 Compact, respectively.
Conclusion:
Discordant results have been observed across different susceptibility testing methods as well as using different interpretative criteria. As this study was conducted on a small number of isolates, additional studies are needed to determine an interpretation category for Indian isolates.
More Related Videos
11:28A Reference Broth Microdilution Method for Dalbavancin In Vitro Susceptibility Testing of Bacteria that Grow Aerobically
Published on: September 9, 2015
12:39Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Complex for First and Second Line Drugs by Broth Dilution in a Microtiter Plate Format
Published on: June 24, 2011
Related Concept Videos
Automated Microbial Diagnostics
Antimicrobial Effectiveness