Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

471
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
471
Non-Verbal Cues01:29

Non-Verbal Cues

517
Non-verbal communication extends beyond gestures and facial expressions to include vocal elements known as paralanguage. Paralanguage consists of non-verbal vocal cues such as pitch, loudness, speech rate, pauses, and non-verbal vocalizations like laughter, sighs, and moans. These elements not only accompany speech but also provide critical emotional and contextual information.The Role of Paralanguage in CommunicationParalanguage adds depth to spoken language by conveying emotions and...
517
Language Development01:22

Language Development

1.1K
Children master language quickly and with relative ease, supported by both biological predisposition and reinforcement. B. F. Skinner (1957) proposed that language is learned through reinforcement, while Noam Chomsky (1965) argued that language acquisition mechanisms are biologically determined.
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
1.1K
Introduction to the Sign Test01:10

Introduction to the Sign Test

1.5K
The sign test is an important tool in nonparametric statistics, offering a straightforward yet effective method for analyzing matched pairs, nominal data, or hypotheses concerning the median of a population. It transforms data points into positive or negative signs, avoiding the need for assumptions about data distribution and instead focusing on the direction of change. It is particularly valuable when data does not conform to the normal distribution requirements of many parametric tests. For...
1.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The processing of multiple letters and multiple words in deaf adults.

Memory & cognition·2025
Same author

Impact of Deafness on the Lateralized Brain Responses to Letters and Digits: A Fast Periodic Visual Stimulation Exploratory Study in Deaf and Hearing Children.

Developmental science·2025
Same author

Investigating the crowding effect on letters and symbols in deaf adults.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Stronger neural response to canonical finger-number configurations in deaf compared to hearing adults revealed by FPVS-EEG.

Human brain mapping·2023
Same author

Deafness and early language deprivation influence arithmetic performances.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2022
Same author

The role of motivation factors in exergame interventions for fall prevention in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Frontiers in neurology·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Exploring Infant Sensitivity to Visual Language using Eye Tracking and the Preferential Looking Paradigm
06:07

Exploring Infant Sensitivity to Visual Language using Eye Tracking and the Preferential Looking Paradigm

Published on: May 15, 2019

9.3K

Distinct Neural Responses to Number Signs and Number Gestures in Hearing Second Language Signers.

Margot Buyle1, Virginie Crollen1

  • 1Psychological Sciences Research Institute (IPSY) and Institute of NeuroScience (IoNS), Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.

The European Journal of Neuroscience
|April 9, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Sign language knowledge enhances neural discrimination of manual number signs compared to gestures in hearing adults. This neurophysiological evidence supports sign language as a distinct linguistic system, even with late acquisition.

Keywords:
canonical representationselectroencephalography (EEG)finger‐number configurationsfrequency tagginggesturessign language

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication
07:18

Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication

Published on: January 26, 2024

1.4K
Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

8.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Exploring Infant Sensitivity to Visual Language using Eye Tracking and the Preferential Looking Paradigm
06:07

Exploring Infant Sensitivity to Visual Language using Eye Tracking and the Preferential Looking Paradigm

Published on: May 15, 2019

9.3K
Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication
07:18

Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication

Published on: January 26, 2024

1.4K
Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

8.2K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Linguistics
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Distinguishing between sign language and gestures is crucial, with sign languages possessing linguistic features while gestures are considered external.
  • This distinction is supported by evidence of different brain regions involved in processing sign language versus gestures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if sign language knowledge modulates the neural processing distinction between manual number signs and number gestures in hearing adults.
  • To determine if late acquisition of sign language influences neural responses to manual number representations.

Main Methods:

  • Employed a fast periodic visual stimulation (FPVS) electroencephalography (EEG) design.
  • Compared neural responses in late hearing signers and hearing non-signers.
  • Presented finger-number configurations as either number signs or number gestures.

Main Results:

  • Hearing signers exhibited significantly stronger neural discrimination responses to number signs compared to hearing non-signers.
  • Both groups showed similar neural responses to number gestures.
  • Neural responses to manual number representations were modulated by linguistic experience.

Conclusions:

  • Number signs and number gestures elicit distinct neural responses based on an individual's sign language experience.
  • Late acquisition of sign language is sufficient to alter neural processing of manual number representations.
  • Provides neurophysiological evidence supporting the linguistic status of sign languages and their recruitment of language-specific neural mechanisms.