Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Production and Testing of Moisture Behavior and Thermal Properties of Rapeseed Straw and Ganoderma resinaceum Mycelium Bio-Composites
Published on: September 5, 2025
Comparing substrates for mycelium-based composite insulation materials with thermal and environmental assessment
Joni Wildman1, Valeria Cascione2, Daniel Henk3
1Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, University of Bath, Bath, UK. jlw89@bath.ac.uk.
Mycelium-based composites (MBCs) offer sustainable building insulation. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) shows substrate choice significantly impacts environmental performance, with carbon sequestration being key, not just thermal conductivity.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Environmental Science
- Biotechnology
Background:
- The construction industry seeks sustainable alternatives to traditional insulation materials with high embodied carbon.
- Mycelium-based composites (MBCs), grown on lignocellulosic feedstocks, present a promising bio-based insulation solution.
- Substrate selection critically influences the thermal and environmental performance of MBCs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the thermal performance and environmental impacts of MBCs using different substrates.
- To emphasize the importance of a functional unit (FU) accounting for thermal performance in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA).
- To determine the dominant factors influencing the Global Warming Potential (GWP) of MBC insulation.
Main Methods:
- Production of MBCs using Lentinus tigrinus mycelium on five substrates: ash-wood chips, bark, beech-wood sawdust, hemp shiv, and wheat straw.
- Measurement of thermal conductivity (λ) using ASTM C518.
- Calculation of a mass-based functional unit (FU) for insulation (R-value of 1 m·K/W).
- Cradle-to-gate LCA (EN 15804) to compare environmental impacts per FU.
- Analysis of transport distance, waste designation, and carbon sequestration uncertainty.
Main Results:
- Straw-based MBCs exhibited the lowest thermal conductivity (λ = 0.031 W/m·K), while ash-wood chips had the highest (λ = 0.048 W/m·K).
- Ash-wood chip MBCs showed the lowest total GWP (-9.77 kg CO2 eq) per FU, whereas straw-based MBCs had the highest (4.04 kg CO2 eq).
- Carbon sequestration emerged as the dominant factor influencing GWP, overriding thermal conductivity and substrate sourcing strategies.
Conclusions:
- Low thermal conductivity MBCs can be produced from diverse substrates.
- Substrate selection for MBC insulation must balance thermal properties with environmental performance, prioritizing carbon sequestration.
- The study highlights the need for comprehensive environmental trade-offs in optimizing bio-based insulation materials.
More Related Videos
07:15A Testing Platform for Durability Studies of Polymers and Fiber-reinforced Polymer Composites under Concurrent Hygrothermo-mechanical Stimuli
Published on: December 11, 2014
08:21Isolation and Screening from Soil Biodiversity for Fungi Involved in the Degradation of Recalcitrant Materials
Published on: May 16, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Thermal Insulation in Masonry Walls
External insulation can be applied using an Exterior Insulation and Finish System (EIFS), which involves affixing panels of plastic foam to the wall and covering them with a polymeric stucco reinforced with glass fiber mesh....
Insulation Coordination