Mechanisms of rebound suppression of oil-in-water emulsion droplet on superhydrophobic surface
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Measuring the Interaction Force Between a Droplet and a Super-hydrophobic Substrate by the Optical Lever Method
Published on: June 14, 2019
Chen Gong1, Mingzhi Yan1, Aichen Wang1
1School of Agricultural Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
Background:
Mitigating the rebounding of pesticide droplets on superhydrophobic leaf is of great significance for improving pesticide utilization. The purpose of this study is to elucidate the physical mechanism by which oil-in-water emulsions suppress rebounding, analyze the effects of emulsion concentration, impact velocity and droplet diameter on the impact process, identify the critical Weber number at which rebound ceases, and provide theoretical guidance for spray application.
Results:
Four distinct outcomes were observed for droplet impact on superhydrophobic surfaces: complete rebound, partial rebound, transition, and adhesion. With increasing emulsion concentration, impact velocity, and droplet diameter, droplets were more likely to adhere to the superhydrophobic surface. When adhesion occurred, splashing was typically observed during the spreading stage, accompanied by satellite droplets separation during the retraction stage. When the emulsion concentration is less than or equal to 0.6%, the droplet impact outcomes can be categorized by the Weber number; the critical Weber number for droplets adhering to the superhydrophobic surface is 279.
Conclusion:
The suppression of droplet rebounding is governed by a wetting-induced energy dissipation mechanism. Surface wetting increases the contact area between the droplet and the surface, which enhances frictional resistance and energy dissipation. The maximum spreading velocity and coefficient of droplets increase with impact velocity and droplet diameter; accordingly, greater shear gradients and wetted areas lead to higher viscous dissipation and frictional energy loss. Furthermore, larger droplet diameter and higher impact velocity reduce the droplet's resistance to deformation and breakup, resulting in satellite droplets separation and therefore greater energy loss. © 2026 Society of Chemical Industry.
More Related Videos
08:02Rendering SiO2/Si Surfaces Omniphobic by Carving Gas-Entrapping Microtextures Comprising Reentrant and Doubly Reentrant Cavities or Pillars
Published on: February 11, 2020
08:27Aqueous Droplets Used as Enzymatic Microreactors and Their Electromagnetic Actuation
Published on: August 28, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Surface Tension, Capillary Action, and Viscosity
The various IMFs between identical molecules of a substance are examples of cohesive forces. The molecules within a liquid are surrounded by other molecules and are attracted equally in all directions by the cohesive forces within the liquid. However, the molecules on the surface of a liquid are attracted only by about one-half as many molecules. Because of the unbalanced molecular attractions on the surface molecules, liquids contract to form a shape that minimizes the number...
Colloids
Excess Pressure Inside a Drop and a Bubble
Colloidal precipitates
Cohesion
On a...
Surface Active Agents