Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Mixed Reality Assisted Radical Endoscopic Thyroidectomy
Published on: January 31, 2025
Applicant Characteristics Associated With Being Ranked by US Surgical Specialty Programs in 2022-2025
Katie S Byrd1, Sara G Balestrieri2, Christopher A Feddock3
1is a Quantitative Research Analyst, National Resident Matching Program, Washington, DC, USA.
Surgical residency programs show varied applicant ranking patterns. General surgery programs rank more US DOs and international medical graduates (IMGs) compared to other specialties, with differences also noted by applicant type and USMLE scores.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Surgical Residency Matching
- Applicant Ranking Dynamics
Background:
- Understanding surgical specialty program ranking patterns is crucial for informed decision-making by both residency applicants and programs.
- Applicant characteristics significantly influence how programs rank candidates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the characteristics of applicants on program rank order lists (ROLs) for five surgical specialties: general surgery, neurological surgery, orthopaedic surgery, otolaryngology, and plastic surgery.
- To determine if applicant characteristics differ between competitive and less competitive segments of the ROLs.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 2899 certified program ROLs from the 2022-2025 NRMP Main Residency Matches for five surgical specialties.
- Inclusion of USMLE data and applicant demographic information, examining variables such as medical school type, location/citizenship, sex, URiM status, and USMLE Step 1/Step 2 CK scores.
- Utilized descriptive statistics and boxplots to identify ranking patterns.
Main Results:
- General surgery programs demonstrated higher rates of ranking US DOs (79.1%) and US IMGs (48.6%) compared to other specialties.
- Other surgical specialties ranked US DOs (18.0-49.7%), US IMGs (<20%), and non-US IMGs (20.4-54.8%) with varying frequencies.
- Fewer than 15% of non-general surgery specialties ranked applicants with prior USMLE Step 1 or Step 2 CK failures.
Conclusions:
- Significant differences in ranking patterns were observed across the five surgical specialties based on applicant type and USMLE performance.
- Applicant sex and underrepresented in medicine (URiM) status also showed differential ranking patterns, though to a lesser extent.
More Related Videos
07:48Intraoperative Video Consultation Following Bile Duct Transection Facilitates Direct OR Transfer for Robotic Hepaticojejunostomy at Tertiary Center
Published on: January 9, 2026
05:04Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
Published on: August 9, 2024