Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach
Published on: August 24, 2018
Stepwise Modified Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation in Sites With 3-5-mm Residual Bone Height: A Retrospective Study
Wenjun Duan1,2, Kexin Yang1, Katong Lo1
1Stomatology Hospital, School of Stomatology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedical Research of Zhejiang Province, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Stepwise modified transcrestal sinus floor elevation (SM-TSFE) offers comparable implant survival to lateral sinus floor elevation (LSFE) for short residual bone height. SM-TSFE significantly reduces sinus membrane perforation risk, enhancing patient safety.
Area of Science:
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Dental Implantology
- Bone Grafting Procedures
Background:
- Sinus floor elevation is crucial for dental implant placement in atrophic maxillas.
- Residual bone height (RBH) of 3-5 mm presents a challenge for standard sinus lift techniques.
- Comparing transcrestal and lateral approaches is essential for optimizing outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of stepwise modified transcrestal sinus floor elevation (SM-TSFE) versus lateral sinus floor elevation (LSFE).
- To evaluate implant survival rates, sinus membrane perforation, and bone loss in patients with 3-5 mm RBH.
- To identify risk factors associated with implant failure and perforation.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of 149 patients undergoing simultaneous implant placement with SM-TSFE (n=69) or LSFE (n=80).
- Follow-up period: 6 months to 8 years.
- Clinical outcomes: implant survival, membrane perforation, complications. Radiographic outcomes: RBH, marginal bone loss (MBL), vertical bone height.
Main Results:
- Comparable cumulative implant survival rates between SM-TSFE (91.30%) and LSFE (93.75%).
- Significantly lower sinus membrane perforation rate in the SM-TSFE group (7.24%) compared to LSFE (18.75%).
- Maxillary sinus septa identified as a major risk factor for perforation; TiUnite surface and membrane perforation increased implant failure risk.
Conclusions:
- SM-TSFE provides comparable implant survival to LSFE in sites with 3-5 mm RBH.
- SM-TSFE offers a significant safety advantage with a substantially lower rate of sinus membrane perforation.
- This technique enhances predictability and safety for short residual bone height cases.
More Related Videos
04:19Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024
06:13Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
Published on: June 20, 2018