Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Comprehensive Endovascular and Open Surgical Management of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations
Published on: October 20, 2017
Embolic Agent Selection and Outcomes in Renal Angiomyolipoma Embolisation
Ross O'Shea1, Himanshu Pendse1,2, Kevin Ho1
1Medical Imaging and Interventional Radiology Department, Fiona Stanley Hospital, South Metropolitan Health Service, Perth, WA, Australia.
Purpose:
To evaluate whether embolic agent selection influences outcomes following selective arterial embolisation (SAE) of renal angiomyolipomas (r-AMLs) and to assess procedural safety and effects on renal function.
Materials And Methods:
A retrospective observational study was performed of all r-AML SAEs undertaken at a tertiary institution between 2015 and 2024. Change in tumour size on pre- and 3-6-month post-procedural imaging was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included technical success, re-intervention rates, complications (Clavien-Dindo), renal function change and length of hospital stay. Outcomes were compared across embolic agents including microparticles, liquid embolic agents, coils and combined approaches.
Results:
Forty-nine patients (51 lesions) underwent angiography, with SAE attempted in 54 procedures. Technical success was achieved in 91%. Tumour size reduction occurred in 91% of lesions with follow-up imaging, with a mean reduction of 1.75 cm (p < 0.0001). Liquid embolic agents alone demonstrated the greatest mean tumour reduction with a mean reduction of 2.4 cm and a 0% re-intervention rate. Microparticles alone achieved significant size reduction with a low re-intervention rate, while coil-only embolisation was associated with inferior outcomes and higher re-intervention rates. Combined embolisation strategies achieved significant tumour reduction but did not outperform liquid agents alone. Complications occurred in 10% of patients and were predominantly minor. No patient required renal replacement therapy, and the median eGFR did not change significantly.
Conclusion:
SAE is a safe and effective treatment for r-AML in both elective and emergency settings. Liquid embolic agents achieved the greatest tumour reduction with low re-intervention rates, while coil-only embolisation showed inferior outcomes and should be avoided where possible.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care

