Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Magnetic Susceptibility and Permeability01:31

Magnetic Susceptibility and Permeability

2.9K
In linear magnetic materials, like paramagnets and diamagnets, magnetization is proportional to the magnetic field intensity. The constant of proportionality, a dimensionless number, is called magnetic susceptibility. The value of the susceptibility depends on the type of material.
When diamagnetic materials are placed under an external magnetic field, the moments opposite to the field are induced. Hence, the susceptibility for diamagnets has a minimal negative value of 10-5–10-6. Since...
2.9K
Magnetic Field Due To A Thin Straight Wire01:27

Magnetic Field Due To A Thin Straight Wire

5.1K
Consider an infinitely long straight wire carrying a current I. The magnetic field at point P at a distance a from the origin can be calculated using the Biot-Savart law.
5.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

TMS timed to interictal epileptiform discharges.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Distinct cortical excitability and connectivity profiles within the human SMA complex.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Quantifying Cerebellar Signal Detectability in MEG and EEG in Epilepsy Using Anatomically Informed Source Modeling.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Attenuation of acoustic energy in transcranial magnetic stimulation coils by viscous media.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2025
Same author

Tracking electrophysiological signatures of Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review of multimodal studies.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025
Same author

Lower Cortical Activation and Altered Functional Connectivity Characterize Passive Auditory Spatial Attention in ASD.

Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research·2025
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Detecting Pre-Stimulus Source-Level Effects on Object Perception with Magnetoencephalography
09:25

Detecting Pre-Stimulus Source-Level Effects on Object Perception with Magnetoencephalography

Published on: July 26, 2019

7.4K

Conductivity Deviations as Virtual Sources in Magnetoencephalography.

Seppo P Ahlfors1,2, Seok Lew3, Matti S Hämäläinen4

  • 1Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA. sahlfors@mgh.harvard.edu.

Brain Topography
|April 24, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) virtual sources model brain electrical activity. Comparing Volume Current Formulation (VCF) and Secondary Current Formulation (SCF) reveals distinct virtual source characteristics and magnetic field contributions, aiding conductivity effect analysis.

Keywords:
FontanelForward modelMEGSecondary currentSkull defectVolume current

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancing Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery in Children Through Novel Biomarkers and Enhanced Localization
09:57

Author Spotlight: Advancing Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery in Children Through Novel Biomarkers and Enhanced Localization

Published on: September 20, 2024

3.5K
Concurrent Recording of Co-localized Electroencephalography and Local Field Potential in Rodent
08:31

Concurrent Recording of Co-localized Electroencephalography and Local Field Potential in Rodent

Published on: November 30, 2017

14.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Detecting Pre-Stimulus Source-Level Effects on Object Perception with Magnetoencephalography
09:25

Detecting Pre-Stimulus Source-Level Effects on Object Perception with Magnetoencephalography

Published on: July 26, 2019

7.4K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery in Children Through Novel Biomarkers and Enhanced Localization
09:57

Author Spotlight: Advancing Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery in Children Through Novel Biomarkers and Enhanced Localization

Published on: September 20, 2024

3.5K
Concurrent Recording of Co-localized Electroencephalography and Local Field Potential in Rodent
08:31

Concurrent Recording of Co-localized Electroencephalography and Local Field Potential in Rodent

Published on: November 30, 2017

14.6K

Area of Science:

  • Biophysics
  • Neuroscience
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Magnetoencephalography (MEG) measures brain electrical activity using primary and volume currents.
  • Conductivity inhomogeneities in biological tissues create virtual sources, complicating signal interpretation.
  • Understanding virtual sources is crucial for accurate MEG data analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To derive and compare Volume Current Formulation (VCF) and Secondary Current Formulation (SCF) for virtual sources.
  • To analyze how conductivity deviations affect virtual source characteristics in VCF and SCF.
  • To illustrate the complementary nature of VCF and SCF using a model of infant fontanelles.

Main Methods:

  • Derivation of VCF and SCF for virtual sources based on conductivity deviations.
  • Analysis of virtual source location, orientation, and magnitude in both formulations.
  • Comparison of magnetic field contributions from radial virtual sources in VCF and SCF under spherical symmetry.

Main Results:

  • In VCF, virtual sources are located at conductivity deviations and depend on the electric field.
  • In SCF, virtual sources are determined by conductivity distribution and anatomical boundaries.
  • VCF radial components do not influence MEG, while SCF radial components affect tangential magnetic fields.

Conclusions:

  • VCF and SCF offer complementary perspectives on conductivity effects in MEG.
  • The choice of formulation impacts the interpretation of virtual sources and their magnetic signatures.
  • These formulations provide a framework for analyzing complex conductivity patterns in neuroimaging.