Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Reproductive Hysteroscopy Approach for Complete Endometrial Polyp Removal and Enhanced Endometrial Receptivity
Published on: August 2, 2024
Pregnancy Outcomes Following Medical Therapy versus Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System for Atypical
Min Wang1, Shaojie Zhao1, Hua Yuan1
1Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Wuxi Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Affiliated Women's Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Objective:
To compare pregnancy outcomes between systemic progestin therapy and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) desiring fertility preservation.
Methods:
This single-center retrospective cohort study included AEH patients who underwent fertility-sparing treatment between January 2017 and December 2024. Patients received either systemic progestins (medroxyprogesterone acetate [MPA] 250-600 mg/day, megestrol acetate [MA] 160-320 mg/day, or dydrogesterone 20-40 mg/day) or LNG-IUS. Primary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate. Secondary outcomes included time to pregnancy (TTP), conception mode, and disease recurrence rate. Propensity score matching (PSM) controlled for confounders including age, body mass index, polycystic ovary syndrome, and infertility duration.
Results:
Of 186 patients (121 medical therapy, 65 LNG-IUS), 58 per group were analyzed after PSM. Complete remission rates were 77.6% (45/58) versus 84.5% (49/58) (adjusted OR 1.52, 95% CI 0.71-3.26, p=0.28). Among patients achieving complete remission, clinical pregnancy rates were 51.1% (23/45) versus 67.3% (33/49) (adjusted OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.08-4.25, p=0.029). Live birth rates were 37.8% (17/45) versus 55.1% (27/49) (adjusted OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.13-4.62, p=0.022). Median TTP was 8.5 months (IQR 6-14) versus 6.0 months (IQR 4-10) (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.12-2.41, p=0.011). Per-protocol analysis yielded consistent results.
Conclusion:
LNG-IUS treatment was associated with significantly higher clinical pregnancy rates, live birth rates, and shorter TTP compared to systemic progestin therapy. These findings support LNG-IUS as a preferred fertility-sparing option for AEH patients, particularly when expedited conception is desired. Results should be interpreted considering the retrospective design, heterogeneous dosing, and potential residual confounding.
More Related Videos
06:24Fertility Sparing Procedure using Carbon Dioxide Fiber Laser Vaporization of Ovarian Endometrioma
Published on: July 6, 2022
05:46Introduction of Intracapsular Rotary-cut Procedures IRCP: A Modified Hysteromyomectomy Procedures Facilitating Fertility Preservation
Published on: January 17, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Intrauterine Drug Delivery Systems
Birth Control Methods
Ovarian Cycle