Prioritising Health Workforce Solutions for Rural and Regional Queensland: A Delphi Study
Tracy Flenady1, Tessa Benveniste2, Drew Dawson3
1School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Sciences, CQUniversity, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia.
Background:
Persistent health workforce shortages in regional, rural and remote Australia compromise access to equitable, high-quality care. Despite multiple initiatives, recruitment and retention challenges remain. Evidence-informed, context-specific solutions are needed to address local workforce needs.
Aim:
To identify and prioritise locally responsive health workforce models in Central Queensland and assess their feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness from the perspective of local stakeholders.
Methods:
A modified Delphi method was used, comprising two rounds of online surveys with health practitioners and administrative staff. In Round One, participants rated 11 workforce models, developed from prior qualitative interviews and expert roundtable discussions, on feasibility and effectiveness using a five-point Likert scale. Open-text responses were collected to provide qualitative insights. Models meeting predefined consensus thresholds (≥ 70% feasibility or ≥ 60% effectiveness) progressed to Round Two, where participants, stratified by profession (nursing, medical, allied health, other), re-evaluated the shortlisted models. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, and qualitative responses were analysed using deductive thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006).
Results:
Seven models met consensus thresholds in Round One: Placement, Career Broker, Transport Partner, Telehealth Blended, Advertisement/Pop Culture, Expatriate and FIFO. In Round Two, the Placement model was consistently rated highly across all professional groups, with strong support also for the Career Broker and Transport Partner models, particularly among allied health and nursing participants. Models requiring significant system reform, such as Expatriate and FIFO, received more variable ratings.
Conclusion:
Locally grounded, system-supported strategies, especially Placement, Career Broker and Transport Partner models, were favoured over approaches relying on external incentives or structural overhaul. Implementation of these models, supported by pilot testing and collaborative evaluation, offers a promising pathway to strengthening rural and regional workforce sustainability.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
Secondary Healthcare System
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...
Tertiary Healthcare System
Nursing Implementation
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.


