Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
BioACE: An Automated Framework for Biomedical Answer and Citation Evaluations
Deepak Gupta1, Davis Bartels1, Dina Demner-Fushman1
1Division of Intramural Research, National Library of Medicine, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, 20894, MD, USA.
Evaluating answers from large language models (LLMs) in biomedicine is challenging. BioACE offers an automated framework to assess answer quality and citation accuracy, improving biomedical NLP tasks.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Natural Language Processing
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Scientific Literature Evaluation
Background:
- Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for biomedical question answering, necessitating robust evaluation methods.
- Evaluating LLM-generated text in the biomedical domain is complex due to specialized terminology and the need for expert scientific assessment.
- Existing methods struggle with the nuances of biomedical text generation, including question answering and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce BioACE, an automated framework for evaluating biomedical answers and their supporting citations generated by LLMs.
- To develop and validate automated metrics for assessing answer completeness, correctness, precision, and recall against ground-truth facts.
- To compare the effectiveness of various approaches, including natural language inference (NLI) and other language models, for citation quality evaluation.
Main Methods:
- Developed BioACE, an automated framework for biomedical answer and citation evaluation.
- Implemented automated approaches to assess answer completeness, correctness, precision, and recall.
- Utilized natural language inference (NLI), pre-trained language models, and LLMs to evaluate citation quality and evidence.
- Conducted extensive experiments to correlate automated evaluations with human assessments.
Main Results:
- The BioACE framework provides automated evaluation of biomedical answers and citations.
- Automated metrics demonstrated correlation with human evaluations for answer quality assessment.
- Analysis identified optimal approaches for evaluating biomedical answer and citation quality.
- The study offers a comprehensive evaluation package for LLM-generated biomedical content.
Conclusions:
- BioACE presents a significant advancement in the automated evaluation of LLM-generated biomedical text.
- The framework addresses the critical need for reliable assessment of answers and citations in the biomedical domain.
- BioACE facilitates the responsible development and deployment of LLMs for biomedical applications.
- The findings guide the selection of best practices for biomedical answer and citation evaluation.
More Related Videos
09:20Cloud-Based Phrase Mining and Analysis of User-Defined Phrase-Category Association in Biomedical Publications
Published on: February 23, 2019
04:24Author Spotlight: Advancing Biotherapeutic Mass Calculation by Introducing mAbScale, a Python-Based Desktop Application
Published on: June 16, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence: Overview
Biostatistics: Overview
Discrete variables are...
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Integrated Healthcare System
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics: Overview