Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethnic Identity within a Larger Culture01:27

Ethnic Identity within a Larger Culture

417
Adolescents from ethnic minority backgrounds face a multifaceted journey in forming their identities, shaped by the intersections of cultural expectations and personal exploration. For these adolescents, identity formation involves not only typical developmental challenges but also navigating the perceptions and attitudes of the majority culture. As they grow, adolescents in ethnic minority groups often become increasingly aware of stereotypes, social biases, and discrimination, all of which...
417
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

28.5K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
28.5K
Role-Based Identity01:21

Role-Based Identity

306
Role-based identities are central to understanding how individuals navigate social environments by adopting distinct self-conceptions aligned with various societal roles. These identities are not fixed traits but are constructed through personal actions and the social feedback individuals receive in context-specific interactions. Each social role, such as student, teacher, or friend, carries a set of expectations and norms that influence how people think, feel, and behave within that...
306
Social Identity01:29

Social Identity

502
Social identity constitutes a significant aspect of an individual’s self-concept, shaped by membership in various social groups, including gender, nationality, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and political affiliation. Individuals associate specific traits with particular social groups, leading to internalization of these traits. For example, musicians are often perceived as creative, while women are frequently associated with nurturing tendencies. Once individuals identify with a...
502
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

77.8K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
77.8K
Marcia's Theory of Identity Status01:26

Marcia's Theory of Identity Status

2.6K
James Marcia's identity status model provides a framework for understanding how adolescents navigate identity formation through varying degrees of exploration and commitment. Marcia's model builds on Erik Erikson's theories of psychosocial development, focusing specifically on how adolescents reconcile individual aspirations with societal expectations. His model describes identity formation as a dynamic process where adolescents move between different states depending on their level...
2.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

Looking Back With Logos the Cat: Unsettling the Gaze in Multispecies Research.

Qualitative inquiry : QI·2026
Same author

Body-Mapping the Affective Politics of Bariatric Surgery.

International review of qualitative research : IRQR·2026
Same author

Differences as potentials: A posthuman re-envisioning of disability and mobility.

Health (London, England : 1997)·2025
Same author

Problematising menstrual tracking apps: presenting a novel critical scoping review methodology for mapping and interpreting research literature.

Psychology & health·2025
Same author

Misfits Meet Art and Technology: Cripping Transmethodologies.

Cultural studies <=> critical methodologies·2024
Same author

The third shift: Addressing emotion work in couple therapy.

Family process·2023
Same journal

Beginning in Multiple Midst: Living Alongside in Narrative Inquiry.

Qualitative inquiry : QI·2026
Same journal

Interpretive Methods in Disability Studies: Dyslexia Inflected Inquiry.

Qualitative inquiry : QI·2025
Same journal

Exploring the Relational Commitments of Negotiating Narrative Accounts in Narrative Inquiry.

Qualitative inquiry : QI·2025
Same journal

A Right to Know? Using Access to Information as Method in Critical Criminological Research.

Qualitative inquiry : QI·2025
Same journal

Collaborative Creative Engagements as Drivers for Re-imagining Classrooms and Pedagogies.

Qualitative inquiry : QI·2025
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 1, 2026

Discrimination and Characterization of Heterocellular Populations Using Quantitative Imaging Techniques
09:48

Discrimination and Characterization of Heterocellular Populations Using Quantitative Imaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2017

9.2K

Intersectionality Meets Infrastructure: Recruitment Matrices and Identity Overflow in Just Research.

Carla Rice1, Chelsea Temple Jones1,2, Kimberlee Collins1

  • 1University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

Qualitative Inquiry : QI
|April 30, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study re-examines intersectionality, revealing its potential as infrastructure for understanding complex social relations. It proposes an "infrastructural inversion" to uncover hidden socio-material implications and decolonize categorization beyond white supremacist thought.

Keywords:
infrastructural inversioninfrastructureintersectionalityrecruitment matrices

More Related Videos

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.0K
Monitoring Spatial Segregation in Surface Colonizing Microbial Populations
07:40

Monitoring Spatial Segregation in Surface Colonizing Microbial Populations

Published on: October 29, 2016

13.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 1, 2026

Discrimination and Characterization of Heterocellular Populations Using Quantitative Imaging Techniques
09:48

Discrimination and Characterization of Heterocellular Populations Using Quantitative Imaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2017

9.2K
Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.0K
Monitoring Spatial Segregation in Surface Colonizing Microbial Populations
07:40

Monitoring Spatial Segregation in Surface Colonizing Microbial Populations

Published on: October 29, 2016

13.2K

Area of Science:

  • Social Sciences
  • Critical Theory
  • Sociology

Background:

  • Intersectionality's theoretical and methodological evolution presents challenges for research application.
  • The uptake of intersectionality by institutions and critiques of its appropriation necessitate re-evaluation.
  • Monolithic identity frameworks are challenged by the heterogeneity of difference, impacting intersectional theorizing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To reconsider intersectionality's explanatory power in understanding selves and socialites.
  • To explore intersectionality's potential as infrastructure through an "infrastructural inversion" critique.
  • To enable a decolonized understanding of intersectionality beyond hierarchical categorizations.

Main Methods:

  • Adopting a processual-relational framing to analyze difference.
  • Utilizing an "infrastructural inversion" to reveal hidden work and socio-material implications.
  • Employing "wild containers" (research matrices) to illuminate nondominant differences.

Main Results:

  • Difference is identified as a site of both possibility and danger, exposing limitations of monolithic identities.
  • Intersectionality's potential as infrastructure is revealed through an analysis of its socio-material implications.
  • An "infrastructural critique" uncovers classification systems underpinning intersectionality.

Conclusions:

  • Intersectionality can function as infrastructure, requiring a critical examination of its hidden operations.
  • A decolonized understanding of intersectionality involves inter-/intra-sectional becomings that move beyond imposed hierarchies.
  • The study suggests a path toward more inclusive and nuanced research practices by deconstructing existing categorization systems.