Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

07:16
Author Spotlight: Development of a Novel Finite Element Analysis Model for Improved Orthognathic Surgical Techniques
Published on: October 20, 2023
2.0K
Biomechanical analysis of skeletal open bite treatment methods: a comparative finite element study
Ömer Faruk Sari1, Muhammed Hilmi Büyükçavuş2
1Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara Medipol University, Ankara, Turkiye.
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences
|April 30, 2026
Summary
Zygomatic anchorage plates show greater maxillary intrusion and stress concentration for skeletal anterior open bite compared to chin-caps or headgear. These biomechanical differences are crucial for selecting effective orthodontic treatment strategies.
Area of Science:
- Orthodontics
- Biomechanical analysis
- Craniofacial development
Background:
- Skeletal anterior open bite malocclusion presents complex treatment challenges.
- Various orthodontic appliances aim to correct this condition, but their biomechanical effects differ.
- Understanding these differences is vital for effective treatment planning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the biomechanical effects of zygomatic anchorage plates, vertical chin-caps, and occipital headgear.
- To evaluate stress distribution and displacement patterns in dentofacial structures.
- To inform treatment strategy selection for skeletal anterior open bite.
Main Methods:
- Three-dimensional finite element models were created from CT data.
- Simulations of zygomatic anchorage, vertical chin-cap, and occipital headgear were generated.
- Forces were applied, and stress (Von Mises, minimum principal) and displacement were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Zygomatic anchorage resulted in the highest stress in the posterior maxilla and zygomaticomaxillary suture.
- Peak stress on dental structures was observed at the maxillary first molar root with zygomatic anchorage.
- Greatest tooth and root intrusion was predicted with zygomatic anchorage.
- Vertical chin-cap showed higher condylar stress.
Conclusions:
- Zygomatic anchorage-supported intrusion yields greater posterior maxillary intrusion and stress concentration.
- Distinct biomechanical profiles exist among these orthodontic appliances.
- Appliance selection should consider these biomechanical differences for skeletal anterior open bite treatment.

