Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

The Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump
Published on: February 5, 2021
Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Use in Post-Infarction Ventricular Septal Rupture: The Impact of Timing Relative to
Si Wang1, Qianfeng Xiao1, Fangyang Huang1
1Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Road, Chengdu 610041, China.
Early use of intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABPs) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI)-related ventricular septal rupture (VSR) may improve survival before cardiogenic shock (CS) develops. However, IABP use did not benefit patients once CS was established.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) can lead to cardiogenic shock (CS) and dramatically increased mortality.
- Intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABPs) are used for VSR management, but their optimal timing relative to CS onset is unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) timing on survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction-related ventricular septal rupture (AMI-VSR).
- To determine if initiating IABP before cardiogenic shock (CS) onset improves outcomes compared to post-CS or no IABP use.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 124 patients with AMI-VSR from 2009-2024.
- Patients were categorized into pre-CS IABP, post-CS IABP, and no-IABP groups based on IABP initiation relative to CS onset (defined by catecholamine administration).
- Primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality, analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models, with subgroup analysis by CS status.
Main Results:
- 90-day survival rates were 68.2% (pre-CS IABP), 14.3% (post-CS IABP), and 35.1% (no-IABP).
- Early IABP use (pre-CS) was associated with significantly lower mortality compared to no-IABP and post-CS IABP groups.
- In patients with CS, IABP use showed no survival benefit (19.4% vs. 17.6%); however, among non-CS patients, IABP use was independently associated with lower mortality (85.7% vs. 50.0%).
Conclusions:
- Early IABP initiation in AMI-VSR patients may improve short-term survival, particularly before the onset of cardiogenic shock.
- The survival benefit of IABP was not observed once cardiogenic shock had developed.
- Findings suggest the importance of early risk stratification and timely hemodynamic support for high-risk AMI-VSR patients.
More Related Videos
06:10Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
07:39Use of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device/Left Atrium to Femoral Artery Bypass System for Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: August 16, 2021