The Nerve-Sparing Quality (NSQ) Score: A Novel Intraoperative Scoring System for Assessing Nerve-Sparing Quality...

Introduction: Nerve-sparing (NS) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) plays a critical role in postoperative functional recovery, particularly urinary continence and erectile function. Despite the importance of precise neurovascular bundle (NVB) preservation, intraoperative assessment of NS quality remains largely subjective and lacks standardized evaluation tools. The aim of this study was to develop and preliminarily evaluate a structured intraoperative scoring system designed specifically for assessing NS quality during RARP. Methods: A novel 10-point intraoperative NS scoring system (NSQ Score) based on five domains was developed: dissection plane, bleeding control, bundle manipulation, continuity of dissection, and symmetry. Each parameter was rated on a 0-2 scale. Thirty robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) procedures performed in 2024 were randomly selected from a prospectively maintained institutional surgical video archive. Cases were not pre-filtered based on tumor stage, surgical difficulty, or intraoperative complexity. High-definition video recordings of the nerve-sparing phase were anonymized and independently evaluated by three experienced observers blinded to patient outcomes and to each other's assessments. Inter-rater agreement was analyzed using weighted Cohen's kappa statistics with quadratic weights, complemented by exact and near-agreement proportions. Cluster bootstrap resampling was applied to account for bilateral observations. Results: A total of 48 evaluable observations were analyzed. The overall inter-rater agreement demonstrated a weighted kappa of 0.41 (95% CI 0.36-0.48), indicating fair-to-moderate agreement among reviewers. Exact agreement occurred in 43% of observations, while near-agreement (allowing one ordinal level difference) reached 98%. Among individual parameters, symmetry demonstrated the highest reliability with substantial agreement (κ = 0.70; 95% CI 0.58-0.81). Other domains showed fair agreement, including intraoperative bleeding (κ = 0.36), continuity of dissection (κ = 0.39), bundle manipulation (κ = 0.34), and dissection plane (κ = 0.27). Agreement levels were comparable between left- and right-sided dissections. Conclusions: We propose a novel structured intraoperative scoring system for evaluating nerve-sparing quality during RARP. The scale is simple, procedure-specific, and feasible for structured postoperative or video-based assessment. Preliminary results demonstrate fair-to-moderate inter-rater reliability with very high near-agreement, supporting the feasibility of this tool for clinical use. The proposed scoring system may facilitate standardized training, objective performance assessment, and future studies correlating intraoperative NS quality with functional outcomes.