Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Author Spotlight: An Efficient Methodology to Confidently Differentiate and Characterize Fentanyl Analogs
Published on: November 8, 2024
Federal Enforcement Actions Against Medicare Advantage Plans
Zihan Chen1, Amal N Trivedi1,2, Hayden Rooke-Ley3
1Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Medicare Advantage (MA) enforcement actions varied yearly, with modest fines. Further evaluation is needed to ensure oversight effectively protects beneficiaries and upholds federal standards for MA plans.
Area of Science:
- Health Policy
- Public Health
- Healthcare Administration
Background:
- Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollment exceeds half of all Medicare beneficiaries, representing significant federal investment.
- Robust oversight of MA plans is crucial for program integrity and beneficiary protection.
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) enforcement actions are vital for monitoring MA plan adherence to federal standards.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze CMS enforcement actions against MA contracts from 2010 to 2023.
- To identify characteristics of MA contracts and beneficiaries involved in enforcement actions.
- To assess the trends and nature of CMS enforcement activities in the Medicare Advantage program.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional study of CMS enforcement actions against MA preferred provider organizations and health maintenance organizations (2010-2023).
- Analysis included civil money penalties, enrollment suspensions, and contract terminations.
- Data on contract characteristics, beneficiary demographics, and star ratings were examined.
Main Results:
- 844 enforcement actions were recorded against 493 unique MA contracts (42.0%) between 2010 and 2023.
- Most actions originated from program audits (64.5%), primarily monetary penalties (87.3%).
- Enforcement activity and financial penalties per enrollee fluctuated significantly year-to-year, with terminated contracts showing lower star ratings and different beneficiary demographics.
Conclusions:
- Federal enforcement actions against MA plans demonstrated significant year-to-year variability and imposed modest financial penalties.
- The magnitude of current enforcement actions raises concerns about their effectiveness in deterring noncompliance.
- Further evaluation of oversight and enforcement strategies is warranted to ensure adequate protection for beneficiaries and adherence to federal standards.
Related Concept Videos
Standards of Care I
Standards of Care II
Healthcare Agencies II
Parish nursing is a growing specialty nursing profession that focuses on holistic healthcare, health promotion, and illness prevention. It blends professional nursing practice with a health ministry, focusing on health and healing within the context of a Christian community. Parish nurses serve as health educators, referral sources,...
FDA Approved Drugs: Changes to Approved Drugs
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Drug Regulation

