Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026

An Approach to Study Shape-Dependent Transcriptomics at a Single Cell Level
Published on: November 2, 2020
Classification of cardiomyopathies: bringing order to complexity
Maria Perotto1,2, Carola Pio Loco Detto Gava1,2, Federico Garoia1,2
1Cardiovascular Department, Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Cardiomyopathies, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano-Isontina (ASUGI), University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Cardiomyopathy classification is complex due to disease diversity. A new 2023 ESC model uses a phenotype-first approach, but overlapping features necessitate dynamic diagnostic strategies for accurate cardiomyopathy diagnosis.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Genetics
- Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- Cardiomyopathy classification presents challenges due to significant clinical, morphological, and genetic heterogeneity.
- Previous classification systems include the 2008 ESC morphofunctional classification and the 2013 MOGE(S) system.
- Advances in diagnostic technologies necessitate updated frameworks for disease conceptualization and communication.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce the revised 2023 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) phenotype-first model for cardiomyopathy classification.
- To address the limitations and overlaps observed in current cardiomyopathy phenotypes.
- To highlight the need for advanced diagnostic pathways in managing cardiomyopathies.
Main Methods:
- Review and analysis of recent advances in cardiovascular imaging and genetic diagnostics.
- Evaluation of the five major cardiomyopathy phenotypes: dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM), arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), and non-dilated left ventricular cardiomyopathy (NDLVC).
- Assessment of the overlap and diagnostic challenges among these phenotypes, particularly DCM, ARVC, and NDLVC.
Main Results:
- The 2023 ESC model adopts a phenotype-first approach, categorizing cardiomyopathies into five main types.
- Significant overlap exists between DCM, ARVC, and NDLVC, complicating precise classification.
- Current phenotypic classification alone is insufficient for definitive diagnosis due to extensive overlap.
Conclusions:
- The 2023 ESC phenotype-first model provides a framework but highlights the need for dynamic, multiparametric diagnostic approaches.
- Individualized interpretation of diagnostic data is crucial for accurate cardiomyopathy diagnosis.
- Further research into integrated diagnostic strategies is warranted to overcome classification challenges.
More Related Videos
03:45Investigating the Pathogenesis of MYH7 Mutation Gly823Glu in Familial Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy using a Mouse Model
Published on: August 8, 2022
08:54Creating a Structurally Realistic Finite Element Geometric Model of a Cardiomyocyte to Study the Role of Cellular Architecture in Cardiomyocyte Systems Biology
Published on: April 18, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation