Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

09:31
Surface Properties of Synthesized Nanoporous Carbon and Silica Matrices
Published on: March 27, 2019
Quantifying sorptivity using the contact sponge method: an improved calculation method validated by classical
H Derluyn1, J Desarnaud2, D Vandevoorde3
1LFCR, Universite de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour, CNRS, Pau, France.
Summary
This study improves water absorption assessment for building materials. By combining neutron radiography with capillary rise tests, a new analytical method enhances the accuracy of the contact sponge method (CSM) for field measurements.
Area of Science:
- Building Materials Science
- Civil Engineering
- Material Characterization
Background:
- Non-destructive techniques like the contact sponge method (CSM) and Karsten tubes are used for field assessment of building material water absorption.
- Laboratory capillary rise tests (CR) typically use one-dimensional water flow on small specimens.
- Existing methods show qualitative agreement but lack robust quantitative correlation for sorptivity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate water absorption processes using the contact sponge method (CSM) combined with neutron radiography.
- To address the lack of quantitative correlation between non-destructive field methods and laboratory tests.
- To develop an improved analytical model for sorptivity assessment.
Main Methods:
- Combined neutron radiography for direct water penetration visualization with conventional capillary rise tests (CR) using gravimetric measurements.
- Examined sandstones and limestones with porosities between 10% and 30%.
- Utilized neutron imaging to observe water flow dynamics during CSM.
Main Results:
- Neutron imaging revealed that the assumption of equal water penetration depth and lateral spreading in CSM is invalid.
- An improved analytical expression was developed, accounting for three-dimensional water flow in CSM.
- Significant improvement in quantitative agreement between sorptivity values from CSM and CR tests was achieved.
Conclusions:
- The standard assumption for CSM is not valid, necessitating a revised analytical framework.
- The proposed improved analytical expression enhances the reliability of sorptivity assessment using CSM.
- Adaptation of the CSM field-testing protocol ensures more accurate water absorption evaluations for building materials.

