Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Prognostic Significance of Cdc42 Expression in Colorectal Cancer and Its Concordance Between Primary Tumors and
Oktay Halit Aktepe1, Osman Butun2, Olcay Kurtulan3
1Department of Medical Oncology, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir 35330, Turkey.
Abstract:
Background and Objectives: Aberrant activation or overexpression of cell division cycle 42 (Cdc42) has been demonstrated in various tumors; however, its prognostic relevance in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains insufficiently defined. Thus, we evaluated the prognostic impact of Cdc42 expression in patients with CRC. In a paired primary-metastasis subset, we also assessed the concordance of Cdc42 expression between primary tumors and matched metastatic tissues. Materials and Methods: Cdc42 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry in patients with colorectal cancer who underwent colectomy for curative or palliative purposes between January 2009 and January 2019. Cdc42 expression was quantified as a staining index and then dichotomized into low- and high-Cdc42 groups using a median cutoff value of six. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank testing, and independent prognostic factors were assessed using Cox proportional hazard models. Results: The study included 94 patients (median age, 60 years) with a median follow-up of 88.4 months. High Cdc42 expression was significantly associated with Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) wild-type status (p = 0.001), lymph node metastasis (p = 0.039), and perineural invasion (p = 0.021). Patients with high Cdc42 expression had significantly poorer OS than those with low expression (median OS: 48.5 months, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 33.3-63.7 vs. 114.4 months, 95% CI: 24.0-204.9; p = 0.003). In multivariable Cox regression, high Cdc42 expression remained an independent predictor of worse OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.365, 95% CI: 1.336-4.184; p = 0.003), together with advanced stage and moderate-to-poor differentiation. In the paired primary-metastasis subset, Cdc42 expression in primary tumors correlated positively with that in matched metastases (Spearman ρ = 0.416, p = 0.016), whereas no overall directional shift between paired primary and metastatic samples was observed (Wilcoxon signed-rank test: Z = 0.423, p = 0.672). Conclusions: High Cdc42 expression may serve as an adverse prognostic marker in CRC. Cdc42 shows moderate concordance between primary tumors and matched metastases without a consistent directional shift.
