Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

12:10
Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
Published on: March 4, 2022
Judges looking into themselves: what makes a good judge?
Andreia de Castro Rodrigues1, Ana Rita Cruz2, Olga Cunha3,4
1William James Center for Research & ISPA-Instituto Universitário, Lisboa, Portugal.
Summary
Judges perceive sentencing as rational but reveal introspective views on decision-making. Understanding judicial self-perception is key to addressing bias in sentencing.
Area of Science:
- Criminology
- Psychology
- Law
Background:
- Empirical research on judicial sentencing experiences is limited.
- Understanding judges' professional self-perception is crucial for sentencing research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore criminal judges' self-perception of their role in sentencing.
- To analyze the sentencing decision-making process from the judges' perspective.
Main Methods:
- Mixed-methods approach combining self-report questionnaires (n=49) and semi-structured interviews (n=12).
- Exploratory factor analysis and content analysis were employed.
Main Results:
- Judges described sentencing as logical/rational but expressed more complex views in interviews.
- Judges tended to minimize the role of emotions in sentencing, despite their inevitability.
Conclusions:
- Judicial self-perception highlights potential sources of excessive discretion and implicit bias.
- Training judges in emotion regulation and disclosure is recommended to mitigate bias in sentencing.
Related Concept Videos
Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation
Self-evaluation is the process by which individuals assess their abilities, behaviors, and characteristics based on feedback from others. Charles H. Cooley observed that a person’s self-perception is primarily influenced by how others see and judge them. He suggested that individuals form their identities based on their interpretations of others' reactions. As a result, social interactions play a crucial role in shaping self-esteem and personal identity. These external evaluations often blend...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
First Impression
First impressions play a crucial role in social perception, shaping how individuals assess others in professional, academic, and interpersonal contexts. Psychological research highlights the significance of cognitive biases, such as the primacy and recency effects, which influence how people interpret and recall information.The Primacy Effect and Cognitive AnchoringThe primacy effect describes the tendency for initial information to impact judgment disproportionately. When individuals encounter...
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
Introspection
Introspection, long upheld as a reliable route to self-knowledge, involves examining one's thoughts, emotions, and mental processes. It underpins many psychological practices, from mindfulness meditation to psychotherapy and self-help strategies. However, empirical evidence challenges the accuracy of introspection as a means of understanding oneself.Limitations of Introspective InsightSeminal work by Nisbett and Wilson demonstrated that individuals are frequently unaware of the true causes...
Critical Thinking II
Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following: