Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Management of Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Therapy in the Context of Ultrasound-Guided Invasive Procedures
Andrea Boccatonda1, Alice Brighenti2, Chiara Simion3
1IRCCS University Hospital of Bologna Sant Orsola Polyclinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Emilia-Romagna, Italy, Bologna.
Insights
Most ultrasound-guided procedures can be safely performed without stopping antiplatelet (APT) or anticoagulant (ACT) therapy. Careful assessment of procedure risk and patient context guides decisions, favoring continuation for low-risk interventions.
Area of Science:
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Surgery
- Radiology
Background:
- Aging populations increasingly use antiplatelet (APT) and anticoagulant (ACT) therapies.
- Managing these therapies during invasive procedures presents challenges, balancing bleeding vs. thromboembolic risks.
- Clinical practice for periprocedural antithrombotic management is variable and often lacks evidence-based consistency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To synthesize current data and guidelines on managing APT and ACT during ultrasound-guided procedures.
- To provide a practical, evidence-based framework for clinicians.
- To guide decisions on continuing or temporarily interrupting antithrombotic therapy.
Main Methods:
- Narrative review of contemporary data, guidelines, and real-world evidence.
- Analysis of key decision-making factors: procedure bleeding risk, patient thrombotic risk, drug properties, renal function, and reversal agents.
- Review of evidence for common ultrasound-guided interventions.
Main Results:
- Emerging data support a permissive approach for low-risk ultrasound-guided procedures.
- Moderate- and high-risk procedures require individualized management and potential drug cessation.
- Most ultrasound-guided procedures are safe without APT/ACT discontinuation if risks are assessed.
- Laboratory abnormalities and prophylactic transfusions are poor bleeding predictors and discouraged.
Conclusions:
- Ultrasound-guided procedures can often proceed without antithrombotic therapy interruption.
- Individualized risk assessment is crucial for periprocedural antithrombotic management.
- Further studies are needed to refine decision thresholds and harmonize guidelines.
Abstract:
The growing use of antiplatelet (APT) and anticoagulant therapies (ACT) in an aging population has created increasing challenges when patients require invasive procedures, including those performed under ultrasound (US) guidance. Interrupting these agents may reduce bleeding risk but exposes patients to thromboembolic complications, while continuing therapy may be safe for many low-risk procedures. Current clinical practice remains highly variable and often inconsistent with emerging evidence. This narrative review aims to synthesize contemporary data, guideline recommendations, and real-world evidence regarding periprocedural management of APT and ACT during common ultrasound-guided invasive procedures. The primary goal is to provide clinicians with a practical, evidence-based framework to determine when antithrombotic therapy can be safely continued and when temporary interruption is warranted. We summarize key determinants of periprocedural decision-making-including procedure-specific bleeding risk, patient thrombotic risk, drug class and pharmacokinetics, renal function, and availability of reversal agents-and review evidence across major ultrasound-guided interventions (liver biopsy, paracentesis, thoracentesis, musculoskeletal procedures, breast and head-neck biopsies, and kidney biopsy). Emerging data consistently support a more permissive approach for low-risk procedures performed with ultrasound guidance, whereas moderate- and high-risk procedures still require individualized management and potential temporary drug cessation. Most ultrasound-guided procedures can be safely performed without discontinuing APT or ACT, provided that clinical context and procedural risk are carefully assessed. Standard laboratory abnormalities alone are poor predictors of bleeding, and routine prophylactic transfusions are discouraged. Further prospective studies are needed to refine decision thresholds and support guideline harmonization.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Ultrasound I: Abdominal Ultrasonography
Abdominal ultrasonography, commonly known as abdominal ultrasound, is a vital, non-invasive medical imaging technique widely used in healthcare.
Procedure:
This diagnostic tool allows the clinician to visually inspect internal structures within the abdomen, including vital organs such as the liver, gallbladder, pancreas, kidneys, and spleen.
The abdominal ultrasound process begins with applying a special gel to the patient's skin over the abdomen. This gel enhances the...
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
