Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2026

In Situ Soil Moisture Sensors in Undisturbed Soils
Published on: November 18, 2022
An automated cloud-based system for in-situ geotechnical site characterization using cone penetration test (CPT/CPTu)
Mohamed Ezzat Al-Atroush1,2, Ezz El-Din Hemdan3,4, Christopher Woyeya3
1Department of Engineering Management, College of Engineering, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, KSA, Saudi Arabia. mezzat@psu.edu.sa.
None:
The Cone Penetration Test (CPT) is one of the most reliable and efficient methods for in situ site characterization, assessing ground improvement, and evaluating the potential for liquefaction. Despite CPT's primary limitation being its inability to retrieve physical soil samples, its real-time data continuous geo-data presents a unique opportunity. With that in mind, manual interpretation of CPT data for soil behavior type (SBTn) classification can be time-consuming and subjective. The lack of physical samples makes instantaneous soil behavior type (SBTn) classification at the site even more critical. To address these gaps, this study develops and rigorously evaluates two automation methods: (i) a cloud‑based computational framework (MapCPT) that automates the Robertson‑based normalization and SBT‑chart workflow to deliver auditable SBTn profiles and 2D sections at the site location of acquisition; and (ii) supervised machine learning (ML) models (ANN, SVM, RF) trained to predict SBTn directly from raw CPT/CPTu inputs. Two high‑quality datasets were used: 100 CPTs (37,821 points) from multiple U.S. sites and 20 CPTu soundings (13,205 points) from a single site, for development, testing, and validation. The comparative analysis and validation revealed that MapCPT successfully reproduced manual calculations for qt, Rf, σv0, [Formula: see text] Qtn, Fr, Bq, Ic, and SBTn along depth and generated 2D soil stratigraphic sections in layer‑scale agreement with borehole‑interpreted geology. ML results showed the RF was the superior ML model, achieving accuracy of 93.22% and 94.15% for the CPT and CPTu datasets, respectively; however, generalization was stronger for the geologically coherent, single‑site CPTu dataset than for the heterogeneous, multi‑site CPT dataset. Results indicate that a transparent, physics‑based, cloud‑native workflow presently offers the most reliable path for timely automated SBTn interpretation across sites. The algorithms developed were made publicly available to facilitate verification of this work.
More Related Videos
08:09Measuring and Mapping Patterns of Soil Erosion and Deposition Related to Soil Carbonate Concentrations Under Agricultural Management
Published on: September 12, 2017
14:14Adaptation of Semiautomated Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC) Assays for Clinical and Preclinical Research Applications
Published on: February 28, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Types of Global Positioning System Surveys
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Non-destructive Tests for Concrete Strength
Design Example: Identifying the Locations of Monuments in the Field Using Global Positioning System Device
Field Application of Global Positioning System
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography