Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Acute Myocardial Infarction versus Acute Decompensated Heart Failure in Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and
Mehmet Birhan Yilmaz1, Mustafa Eray Kilic1, Jan Biegus2
1Dokuz Eylul University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Izmir, Türkiye.
Insights
Acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) cardiogenic shock presents more severely than acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF-CS) cardiogenic shock, with increased need for mechanical support and higher short-term mortality.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Critical Care Medicine
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Cardiogenic shock (CS) has distinct phenotypes: acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) and acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF-CS).
- Comparative evidence between these CS phenotypes is limited.
- This meta-analysis aimed to compare presentation, management, and outcomes of AMI-CS versus ADHF-CS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical presentation of AMI-CS and ADHF-CS.
- To compare the management strategies employed for AMI-CS and ADHF-CS.
- To compare the short-term mortality rates between AMI-CS and ADHF-CS.
Main Methods:
- A meta-analysis of observational studies published between 2019 and 2025.
- Studies compared patients with AMI-CS and ADHF-CS.
- Random-effects models were used to estimate odds ratios and mean differences for primary outcome (short-term mortality) and secondary outcomes.
Main Results:
- AMI-CS patients were older with higher ejection fraction but presented with more severe shock (cardiac arrest, SCAI stage D/E).
- Temporary mechanical circulatory support was used more frequently in AMI-CS.
- Short-term mortality was significantly higher in the AMI-CS group (OR 1.58).
Conclusions:
- AMI-CS exhibits a more fulminant presentation, greater need for mechanical support, and higher short-term mortality compared to ADHF-CS.
- A dual-axis framework integrating shock severity and etiology is proposed for future research.
- Prospective studies with detailed phenotyping are needed for validation.
Background/Aim:
Cardiogenic shock (CS) encompasses distinct phenotypes driven by acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) and acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF-CS). Consolidated comparative evidence remains limited. This meta-analysis compared presentation, management, and short-term mortality between AMI-CS and ADHF-CS.
Methods:
Observational studies between 2019 and 2025 comparing AMI-CS and ADHF-CS were summarised in accordance with PRISMA 2020. Random-effects models (REML with Hartung-Knapp) were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals. The primary outcome was short-term (in-hospital/30-day) mortality.
Results:
Twenty-nine studies (497,368 patients) were pooled. AMI-CS patients were older (MD 4.76 years, 95% CI 0.37-9.14) with higher ejection fraction at presentation (MD 6.04%, 4.53-7.55). AMI-CS presented more fulminantly, with greater odds of cardiac arrest (OR 2.03, 1.04-3.98) and SCAI stage D/E shock (OR 1.50, 1.33-1.70); invasive filling pressures did not differ. Phenotype-defining variables (LVEF, SCAI stage, invasive haemodynamics) were extractable in <1.1% of the pooled cohort. Temporary mechanical circulatory support was more frequent in AMI-CS (any device OR 5.44, 2.83-10.46; IABP OR 4.73; pVAD OR 2.67; VA-ECMO OR 3.27). Destination therapy was much less frequent (OR 0.09, 0.03-0.24); major bleeding was modestly higher (OR 1.36, 1.02-1.82). Short-term mortality was higher in AMI-CS (OR 1.58, 1.06-2.37).
Conclusion:
AMI-CS presents more fulminantly than ADHF-CS, with markedly greater mechanical support use and higher short-term mortality. A dual-axis framework integrating shock severity with aetiology is proposed as an organising principle for hypothesis generation; validation in prospective, phenotype-rich cohorts is required.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Imbalances in Cardiac Output
CHF can occur due to the failure of either side of the heart. Left-side failure leads to pulmonary congestion—the right side continues to send blood...
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation

