Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
Published on: September 7, 2019
Source apportionment of PM2.5-bound elemental carbon via stable carbon isotope analysis: A comparison study with
Cheng Wang1, Yulong Yan2, Xiaolin Duan2
1Department of Resource and Environmental Engineering, Shanxi Institute of Energy, Jinzhong, 030600, China.
Abstract:
Isotopes serve as effective tracers for identifying pollutant sources, with carbon isotopes (δ13C) enabling the determination of the sources of carbonaceous aerosols in PM2.5. In this study, PM2.5 samples were collected in Changzhi, China, during winter and summer to determine the mass concentrations and stable carbon isotope (δ13C) of the organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC). The Bayesian mixing model (MixSIAR) was employed to determine the contributions to EC sources in PM2.5 based on δ13C values, and the results were compared with those from positive matrix factorization (PMF) receptor modeling, which used chemical concentrations. During sampling, the δ13COC values exhibited clear seasonal variations in their isotope levels of -23.44‰ in the winter and -26.81‰ in the summer, while δ13CEC exhibited no significant variations in the winter (-25.33‰) or summer (-26.37‰). δ13COC levels in the summer were obviously negative than in the winter, which indicated that δ13COC levels in the summer might be more influenced by secondary organic aerosols. The MixSIAR model identified five sources of EC in PM2.5: gasoline vehicle exhaust (summer: 26.5%; winter: 25.0%), diesel vehicle exhaust (43.5%; 28.0%), coal combustion (14.2%; 22.9%), biomass burning (11.6%; 17.2%), and road dust (4.2%; 6.9%), with distinct seasonal variability in contributions. The results obtained by the PMF model were generally consistent with the results mentioned above. Minor discrepancies in source contributions (e.g., biomass burning, road dust) were attributed to the uncertainty of the tests and methods. The consistency of the results between PMF and MixSIAR models provides cross-validation that reduces overall uncertainty in source apportionment. The preliminary application of carbon isotopes shown in this study highlights that isotopes are effective indicators for source apportionment of the atmospheric pollutants, providing a reliable and cross-validating perspective.

