Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Electron Channeling Contrast Imaging for Rapid III-V Heteroepitaxial Characterization
Published on: July 17, 2015
Measurement of Line Width and Anisotropy in C3/C4-Symmetric Gd(III) Complexes
Edward Latham1, Chowan Ashok Kumar2, Carlson Alexander2
1Research School of Chemistry, Sullivans Creek Rd, Acton, Canberra 2601, Australia.
None:
Gadolinium(III) complexes are frequently used as spin labels in high-field electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy and dynamic nuclear polarization nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy due to their high spin (S = 7/2) ground state and chemical robustness. A primary goal in their design is to minimize the magnetic resonance line width by engineering the zero-field splitting (ZFS). Here, we present a comprehensive experimental study of a series of C3-symmetric TPATCN and C4-symmetric DOTA derivatives. Using multifrequency EPR spectroscopy (34 to 390 GHz) here we try to understand trends in their ZFS parameters (D, E) and their distributions (Dstrain, Estrain). We find that functionalization of the TPATCN scaffold with an electron-withdrawing nitro group (NO2) minimizes the axial ZFS to D = 0.0110 cm-1∥0.330 GHz, but this is coupled with a significant increase in conformational flexibility, resulting in a large Dstrain. Conversely, amide-functionalized DOTA compounds demonstrate superior structural rigidity, evidenced by near-zero rhombic ZFS and small Estrain. Many complexes studied herein show considerably smaller resonance line widths than existing tags, suggesting there is scope for the design of improved Gd(III) spin labels.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Law of Rational Indices
Imperfections in Crystal Structure: Point, Line and Plane Defects
Crystallographic Point Groups
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...

