Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback01:24

Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback

Self-esteem is intricately tied to our perception of competence and our ability to exert control over our lives. One of the primary sources of this perception is performance feedback — the ongoing evaluation of our actions in terms of success and failure. According to Franks and Marolla (1976), people derive self-worth from experiencing themselves as causal agents, capable of achieving goals and overcoming obstacles. This process nurtures a critical component of self-esteem: self-efficacy,...
Negative and Positive Feedback01:18

Negative and Positive Feedback

Animal organs and organ systems constantly adjust to internal and external changes through a process called homeostasis ("steady state"). Examples of these changes include regulation of the level of glucose or calcium in the blood or internal responses to external temperatures. Homeostasis requires  maintaining an internal dynamic equilibrium:
Feedback Loops01:01

Feedback Loops

In most cases, excessive hormone production is prevented by negative feedback—a loop that starts with a stimulus inducing the release of a particular substance, like a hormone, to maintain a certain level before triggering a signal that results in a decrease in further release of the hormone.
Feedback Inhibition00:46

Feedback Inhibition

Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!
Techniques of Therapeutic Communication II: Focusing, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing01:23

Techniques of Therapeutic Communication II: Focusing, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing

Focusing involves centering a conversation on a message's critical elements or concepts. Focusing is valuable if the talk is vague or patients begin to repeat themselves. Sometimes, when patients are asked about their symptoms, they may go off-topic and try to tell their entire life story. Respectfully, the nurse should bring the conversation back into focus.
This therapeutic technique can also be used when a patient brings up pertinent information during a health-related conversation. The...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A map of intra- and intercellular immune responses across diverse in vitro stimuli and inflammatory disease.

Genome medicine·2026
Same author

Machine learning predictions surpass individual mRNAs as a proxy of single-cell protein expression.

Genome biology·2026
Same author

Assessment of Rheumatology Fellows' Skills as Clinical Teachers Through Self-Assessment and Direct Observation.

Arthritis care & research·2025
Same author

The Right Diagnosis Comes to Those Who Measure Correctly.

Annals of the American Thoracic Society·2025
Same author

A 27-Year-Old Woman With Acute Encephalopathy and Painful Bilateral Cervical Lymphadenopathy.

Arthritis care & research·2025
Same author

An Unexpected Finding While Troubleshooting Mechanical Ventilation With Point-of-Care Ultrasound.

Chest·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
07:32

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

Collective verbal feedback as a strategy to elicit faculty feedback.

Haya Jamali1, Sara Char2, Josephine Fisher3

  • 1University of Colorado Anschutz, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

Journal of Hospital Medicine
|June 16, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Collective feedback offers a promising alternative for gathering upward feedback from trainees to faculty in internal medicine residency programs. This method enhances feedback quality and faculty satisfaction compared to traditional evaluations.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
07:32

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education Research
  • Faculty Development
  • Residency Training

Background:

  • Upward feedback is crucial for faculty growth but often yields low-quality results via traditional methods.
  • Educators face challenges in obtaining meaningful trainee feedback.
  • Collective feedback, a group-based verbal approach, shows potential to improve feedback quality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To implement and evaluate collective feedback within an Internal Medicine residency program.
  • To assess resident and faculty perceptions of this novel feedback method.
  • To compare collective feedback with traditional online evaluations.

Main Methods:

  • Six small group sessions were conducted for 15 core faculty, informed by sociocultural and psychological safety theories.
  • Feedback was collated and distributed to faculty.
  • Surveys assessed resident and faculty perceptions of collective feedback versus traditional online evaluations.

Main Results:

  • High response rates were achieved: 86% of residents and 80% of faculty completed surveys.
  • Both faculty and trainees expressed a preference for collective feedback over traditional methods.
  • Trainees provided more meaningful feedback confidentially, and faculty received more actionable, specific, and timely feedback.

Conclusions:

  • Collective feedback shows promise for collecting upward feedback in internal medicine residency programs with close-knit faculty-trainee cohorts.
  • Further research is needed to evaluate its impact on faculty behavior and long-term resident engagement.
  • Generalizability to other educational settings warrants investigation.