Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Potentiation of Anticancer Antibody Efficacy by Antineoplastic Drugs: Detection of Antibody-drug Synergism Using the Combination Index Equation
Published on: January 19, 2019
Multiscale modeling unveils molecular mechanisms of deep eutectic solvent-anticancer drug interactions for rational
Shile Zhou1, Tailong Li1, Xiao Tong1
1Department of Innovation Centre for Advanced Interdisciplinary Medicine, Key Laboratory of Biological Targeting Diagnosis, Therapy and Rehabilitation of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510700, China.
None:
Deep eutectic solvents (DESs) represent a burgeoning class of versatile media with significant potential to enhance the solubility, stability, and bioavailability of poorly water-soluble antineoplastic active pharmaceutical ingredients (AAPIs). However, the rational design of API-specific DES formulations remains impeded by an insufficient mechanistic understanding of the molecular-level interactions that govern API-DES compatibility. To address this critical gap, our study pioneers an integrated multi-scale computational strategy, synergizing free volume analysis, binding energy calculations, and hydrogen-bonding network quantification to unravel the supramolecular interplay between diverse DESs and a panel of clinically relevant AAPIs (including 5-FU, p-toluenesulfonamide (PTS), trigonelline, piperine, phloretin, nonivamide, curcumin, and erlotinib). We demonstrate that the free volume of DESs, formed from choline chloride or betaine with various hydrogen bond donors (HBDs), is dynamically altered upon AAPI incorporation, exhibiting either a "tightening" or "loosening" effect that correlates with dissolution enhancement or molecular stabilization. Interaction total energy (ΔEt) profiles reveal strong dependencies on [HBA][HBD][AAPI] combinations, with glycerol-based DESs showing superior affinity for most AAPIs, while zwitterionic HBDs (e.g. glycine) form less stable complexes. The investigated [DES][AAPI] systems were classified into four ranks (I-IV) representing a descending gradient of predictive certainty and overall solubilization/stabilization potential. DESs such as [ChCl][PG], [ChCl][Glycerol], or [Betaine][Glycerol] appear more frequently in Classes I and IV than in Classes II and III. Given that Class I represents superior performance and Class IV represents high predictive uncertainty (rather than poor performance), the predominance of these DESs in Class I suggests a higher probability of favorable outcomes across diverse AAPIs.These insights provide a predictive framework for the rational design of DES systems tailored to specific APIs, enabling optimized solubility, stability, and controlled release in next-generation drug delivery applications.
Related Concept Videos
Theories of Dissolution: The Danckwerts' Model and Interfacial Barrier Model
Pharmacodynamic Models: Linear Concentration–Effect Model
Factors Affecting Dissolution: Drug Permeability, Stability and Stereochemistry
Multicompartment Models: Overview
These models offer a more comprehensive representation of drug behavior in the body than one-compartment models. They accommodate the complexity of drug distribution,...
Pharmacodynamic Models: Emax Drug–Concentration Effect Model
Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design
SAR studies the intricate relationship between a drug's chemical structure and biological activity. It focuses on understanding how modifications to a drug's structure can influence its...
