Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026
E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Economic Evaluation of the RETURN Intervention to Increase Routine Dental Attendance Among Disadvantaged Adults: Net
Tayamika Zabula1, Victoria Lowers2, Dan Howdon1
1University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Objectives:
Routine dental attendance is associated with better health outcomes, yet those from disadvantaged backgrounds are more likely to seek problem-driven, episodic care. The RETURN intervention, a brief behavioural intervention delivered by dental nurses in urgent care, was designed to support urgent care users to take up planned dental care. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of the RETURN intervention.
Methods:
A cost-utility analysis was conducted alongside a randomised controlled trial. Resource use and health outcomes, measured in Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) derived from the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, were evaluated at 12 and 18 months. The primary analysis used a cost-effectiveness threshold of £20 000 per QALY. Multiple imputation was used to account for missing data. Objectives also included providing an estimated incremental cost per improved Oral health impact profile (OHIP-14) point.
Results:
The intervention was found to be cost-effective with high confidence. At 12 months, intervention incremental cost was £18.83 with incremental Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY) gain of 0.014, and an incremental net health benefit (NHB) of 0.013 QALYs. The probability of cost-effectiveness was 90.5%. At 18 months, the incremental cost was £15.11 for a QALY gain of 0.009, and incremental NHB of 0.008 (probability of cost-effectiveness 70.9%). The findings were supported by complete case analysis, which showed probabilities of cost-effectiveness of 99.7% at 12 months and 98.5% at 18 months. Sub-group analysis gave the strongest evidence of cost-effectiveness in the most deprived populations.
Conclusions:
The RETURN intervention is highly likely to be a cost-effective use of National Health Service resources. Its impact appears particularly strong among those living in the most deprived areas, suggesting the potential to reduce inequalities in access to routine dental care.
Trial Registration:
The RETURN trial was registered at isrctn.com (ISRCTN84666712).
Related Concept Videos
01:30Preventive Healthcare Services
01:21Tooth Anatomy
The Crown, Neck, and Root
The visible part of the tooth is referred to as the crown. It's covered by enamel, the hardest substance in the human body. The crown is uniquely shaped for each type of tooth, allowing for different functions such as cutting, tearing, or grinding food.
01:26Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is limited...
01:15Nursing Evaluation
Section...