Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Home
Volume And Surface Methods For Microparticle Traction Force Microscopy: A Computational And Experimental Comparison.

Home
Volume And Surface Methods For Microparticle Traction Force Microscopy: A Computational And Experimental Comparison.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

DNA origami snaps into place.

Science robotics·2026

Same author

Label Type Influence on DNA Translocation Velocity in Solid-State Nanopores.

ACS nano·2026

Same author

Mechanically Programmable DNA Hydrogel Microparticles for 3D Cellular Systems.

Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)·2026

Same author

Membrane-Spanning Nanopores Formed from Nucleic Acids.

Chemical reviews·2026

Same author

Dynamic switching of cell-substrate contact sites allows gliding diatoms to modulate the curvature of their paths.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026

Same author

Growth, Dissolution and Segregation of Genetically Encoded RNA Droplets by Ribozyme Catalysis.

Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)·2026

Same journal

Axial forces in capillary liquid bridges of polymer solutions.

Soft matter·2026

Same journal

Dual-mode pH-programmable enzymatic hydrogel system for on-demand glucose generation.

Soft matter·2026

Same journal

Loading iron(III)porphyrin as the gas/anion binding site into methylated β-cyclodextrin-incorporated polymer hydrogels.

Soft matter·2026

Same journal

Disorder-induced persistent random motion and trapping of microswimmers.

Soft matter·2026

Same journal

Metal-ion induced coacervation of a short peptide under acidic conditions.

Soft matter·2026

Same journal

Charles Murray van Wyk, a discreet pioneer of fibre network mechanics.

Soft matter·2026

See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Traction Microscopy Integrated with Microfluidics for Chemotactic Collective Migration

Traction Microscopy Integrated with Microfluidics for Chemotactic Collective Migration

Published on: October 13, 2019

Volume and surface methods for microparticle traction force microscopy: a computational and experimental comparison.

Simon Brauburger^1,2,3, Bastian K Kraus^1,2, Tobias Walther⁴

¹Institute for Theoretical Physics, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. schwarz@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de.

|June 23, 2026

View abstract on PubMed

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Comparing two microparticle traction force microscopy methods, the surface method shows lower errors than the volume method for measuring cellular forces. This study validates the surface method using DNA hydrogel microparticles and simulations.

More Related Videos

Pattern Generation for Micropattern Traction Microscopy

Pattern Generation for Micropattern Traction Microscopy

Published on: February 17, 2022

Traction Force Microscopy to Study B Lymphocyte Activation

Traction Force Microscopy to Study B Lymphocyte Activation

Published on: July 23, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Traction Microscopy Integrated with Microfluidics for Chemotactic Collective Migration

Traction Microscopy Integrated with Microfluidics for Chemotactic Collective Migration

Published on: October 13, 2019

Pattern Generation for Micropattern Traction Microscopy

Pattern Generation for Micropattern Traction Microscopy

Published on: February 17, 2022

Traction Force Microscopy to Study B Lymphocyte Activation

Traction Force Microscopy to Study B Lymphocyte Activation

Published on: July 23, 2020

Area of Science:

Mechanobiology
Biophysics
Cellular mechanics

Background:

Measuring cellular forces is crucial in mechanobiology.
Microparticle traction force microscopy (MTFM) infers cell forces from microparticle deformation.
Two MTFM variants exist: volume and surface methods, lacking direct comparison.

Purpose of the Study:

To quantitatively compare the accuracy and performance of the volume and surface methods in MTFM.
To validate findings using both simulated data and experimental measurements.
To introduce novel DNA-based hydrogel microparticles for MTFM.

Main Methods:

Quantitative comparison of volume and surface methods using simulated traction fields.
Development of DNA-based hydrogel microparticles with surface and embedded fluorescent labels.
Experimental validation through compression tests and analysis of traction profiles.

Main Results:

The surface method demonstrated significantly lower reconstruction errors for traction profiles compared to the volume method.
Performance differences diminished at higher noise levels.
Experimental results with DNA microparticles aligned with simulations and Hertzian contact mechanics.

Conclusions:

The surface method is more accurate for reconstructing cellular traction forces than the volume method.
DNA-based hydrogel microparticles are effective and biocompatible tools for cellular force measurements.
Linear elasticity theory remains valid for large experimental deformations (up to 20%).