Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
Predicting students' performance on geometric problem-solving tasks: the roles of cognitive reflection, fluid
Alicia Rubio-Sánchez1,2, Isabel Gómez-Veiga3, Inés M Gómez-Chacón4
1Escuela Internacional de Doctorado, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Madrid, Spain.
Cognitive skills like fluid intelligence and cognitive reflection, along with prior math achievement, significantly predict geometry problem-solving in secondary students. Mathematics beliefs did not add predictive value beyond these factors.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Mathematics Education
- Educational Psychology
Background:
- Understanding student reasoning in mathematics requires integrating cognitive and affective factors.
- Geometric problem-solving is a key area for assessing mathematical reasoning.
- Adolescent cognitive development influences mathematical abilities.
Purpose of the Study:
- Investigate the relationship between geometric problem-solving performance and cognitive skills (fluid intelligence, cognitive reflection).
- Examine the predictive role of mathematics-related beliefs and prior achievement on geometry performance.
- Explore potential gender and academic year differences in geometric problem-solving.
Main Methods:
- Surveyed 303 secondary students (years 8-11) on geometric problem-solving, cognitive reflection, fluid intelligence, and math beliefs.
- Collected prior mathematics achievement data from school records.
- Employed correlational, hierarchical regression, mediation, and moderation analyses.
Main Results:
- Significant differences in geometry performance were found across academic years, but not by gender.
- Cognitive reflection, fluid intelligence, and prior math achievement were significant predictors of geometry performance.
- Mathematics-related beliefs did not explain additional variance in geometry performance beyond cognitive and achievement variables.
Conclusions:
- Reasoning processes are crucial for adolescents' geometric problem-solving.
- Cognitive factors and prior achievement are key predictors of geometry success.
- Mathematics beliefs play a less direct role than cognitive abilities in geometry performance.
Related Concept Videos
Cognitive Learning
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
Intelligence
Piaget's Stage 4 of Cognitive Development
Abstract Reasoning and Hypothetical-Deductive Thinking
Unlike the concrete operational...
Cattell's Theory of Intelligence
Fluid intelligence involves the capacity to solve new problems and adapt to unfamiliar situations. It's the type of intelligence individuals use when they encounter a novel problem or puzzle that requires innovative thinking. For instance, figuring out how to operate a new gadget relies heavily on fluid...
Piaget's Stage 3 of Cognitive Development
Conservation and Constancy of Quantity
A significant cognitive milestone in the concrete...
Solving Problems in Physics
