Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
Published on: June 28, 2018
Topological boundaries in non-Hermitianp-wave Kitaev chains with Rashba spin-orbit coupling.
Shahroze Shahab1, Aditi Chakrabarty1,2,3, Sanjoy Datta1
1Department of Physics and Astronomy, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, Odisha 769008, India.
This study explores how Rashba spin-orbit coupling (RSOC) and non-Hermiticity affect topological phases in Kitaev chains. The interplay drives topological transitions at lower strengths, especially in quasiperiodic potentials.
Area of Science:
- Condensed Matter Physics
- Topological Materials
- Quantum Phase Transitions
Background:
- Topological phase transitions are crucial in condensed matter physics.
- Rashba spin-orbit coupling (RSOC) influences electronic properties in low-dimensional systems.
- Non-Hermitian (NH) systems exhibit unique phenomena beyond Hermitian counterparts.
Purpose of the Study:
- Investigate the combined effects of RSOC and non-Hermiticity on topological phase transitions.
- Explore the interplay between these mechanisms in spinful p-wave Kitaev chains.
- Analyze the influence of different complex on-site potentials (uniform and quasiperiodic).
Main Methods:
- Theoretical analysis of spinful p-wave Kitaev chains.
- Inclusion of uniform and complex quasiperiodic on-site potentials.
- Derivation of analytical expressions for topological phase transitions.
- Numerical validation using energy spectra and real-space winding numbers.
Main Results:
- RSOC's impact on topological phase boundaries is model-dependent.
- In uniform gain/loss models, RSOC affects the NH regime but not the Hermitian limit (under certain conditions).
- In quasiperiodic models, RSOC modifies phase boundaries in both Hermitian and NH cases.
- Combined non-Hermiticity and RSOC induce topological transitions at lower potential strengths.
Conclusions:
- Non-Hermiticity and RSOC cooperatively reshape topological phase diagrams in 1D superconducting systems.
- The findings offer a deeper understanding of topological phenomena in complex quantum systems.
- This research highlights the importance of considering multiple interacting effects in topological material design.
Related Concept Videos
¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene π orbitals.
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Valence Bond Theory
Valence Bond Theory

