Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Viral Tracing of Genetically Defined Neural Circuitry
Published on: October 17, 2012
Cross-System Transcriptomics Suggests Enterovirus A71 Exploits Wound Healing Programs to Target Neural Progenitors in
Nibras Mohammed Ali Hashim1, Noor N Al-Hayani2, Bushra Jabbar Hamad1
1Department of Biology, College of Science, University of Thi-Qar, Nasiriyah, Iraq.
Introduction:
The mechanisms of EV-A71 immune evasion and neuroinvasion are poorly understood. Inactivated vaccines provide protective immunity without the dysregulated inflammation and viral persistence caused by active infection. In this bioinformatics-driven study, our objective was to utilize computational transcriptomics to investigate this dichotomy and determine the specific neural cell populations susceptible to enteroviral infection.
Methods:
We compared bulk RNA-seq data from THP-1 macrophages infected with active versus inactivated EV-A71 to identify viral hijacking programs. We then applied these systemic findings to the neural environment via an iterative Area Under the Curve (AUC)-based optimization strategy. This process refined the broad bulk-derived candidates into a 10-gene consensus signature, which was projected onto a human spinal cord organoid single-cell RNA-seq atlas to map viral susceptibility across distinct developmental lineages.
Results:
While active infection with EV-A71 is associated with a wound-healing program defined by the expression of PMEPA1, ALOX5, CCL1, and SPRED3, the administration of an inactivated virus elicits an anti-inflammatory response without activating a similar transcriptional program. In fact, decreased expression of inflammatory factors (ADORA2A, CCR1, CXCL1) marks this wound-healing stage and leads to the development of an immunosuppressive M2 phenotype. By projecting the highly robust 10-gene consensus (comprising ALDH2, SERPINE2, and L1CAM) against the organoid atlas, we have predicted that the cycling neural progenitors could be the most likely reservoir for EV-A71 replication. Using a Wilcoxon rank sum test with Benjamini-Hochberg correction, we observed the only statistically enriched signature in progenitor cells Discussion: Transcriptomic data indicate that EV-A71 might hijack TGF-β/PMEPA1 and ALOX5 signaling pathways to establish EMT-like behavior. The local acquisition of an M2-like immunosuppressive state might help promote early systemic dissemination, immunologic escape, followed by colonization of the proliferative neural niche prior to the development of neurological symptoms.
Conclusion:
Computational identification of a macrophage gene signature provides robust discrimination of EV-A71 infection from vaccine-based protection in vivo. Mapping the signature to the context of human spinal cord organoids indicates that EV-A71 specifically targets proliferative and regenerative programs of neural stem cells.
Insights
Enterovirus 71 (EV-A71) infection targets neural stem cells by hijacking their regenerative programs. This study identifies a macrophage gene signature to distinguish active EV-A71 infection from vaccine responses.
Area of Science:
- Virology
- Neuroscience
- Computational Biology
Background:
- Enterovirus A71 (EV-A71) immune evasion and neuroinvasion mechanisms remain unclear.
- Inactivated vaccines offer protection without the detrimental effects of active infection, such as inflammation and viral persistence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the dichotomy between active EV-A71 infection and vaccine-induced immunity using computational transcriptomics.
- To identify specific neural cell populations susceptible to enteroviral infection.
Main Methods:
- Compared bulk RNA-seq data from THP-1 macrophages infected with active versus inactivated EV-A71.
- Developed a 10-gene consensus signature and projected it onto a human spinal cord organoid single-cell RNA-seq atlas.
- Utilized an iterative Area Under the Curve (AUC)-based optimization strategy to refine candidate genes.
Main Results:
- Active EV-A71 infection activates a wound-healing program (PMEPA1, ALOX5, CCL1, SPRED3), while inactivated virus elicits an anti-inflammatory response.
- EV-A71 infection leads to an immunosuppressive M2 phenotype with decreased inflammatory factors (ADORA2A, CCR1, CXCL1).
- The 10-gene signature identified cycling neural progenitors as the likely reservoir for EV-A71 replication.
Conclusions:
- A macrophage gene signature computationally identifies EV-A71 infection versus vaccine protection.
- EV-A71 targets proliferative and regenerative programs in neural stem cells within human spinal cord organoids.
More Related Videos
08:48Stable and Efficient Genetic Modification of Cells in the Adult Mouse V-SVZ for the Analysis of Neural Stem Cell Autonomous and Non-autonomous Effects
Published on: February 17, 2016
07:27Targeting the Corticospinal Tract in Neonatal Rats with a Double-Viral Vector using Combined Brain and Spine Surgery
Published on: June 30, 2021