Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2026

Primed Mycobacterial Uveitis (PMU) as a Model for Post-Infectious Uveitis
Published on: December 17, 2021
Comparative Five-Year Risks of Systemic Complications with Biologic versus Conventional Therapy in Noninfectious
Muhammad Z Chauhan1, Jawad Muayad1, Jamie L Surgent-Nahay1
1Harvey and Bernice Jones Eye Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Purpose:
To compare 5-year systemic complication risks in noninfectious uveitis (NIU) patients treated with systemic biologic versus conventional therapy.
Design:
Multicenter, retrospective clinical cohort study.
Participants:
Adult patients (≥18 years old) with NIU from the TriNetX Collaborative Network.
Methods:
We identified patients with NIU. We assembled propensity score-matched comparisons: biologic therapy versus no systemic therapy (n = 6896 each) and biologic versus conventional therapy with corticosteroids matched (n = 5994 each) between January 1, 2005, and January 1, 2024. A prespecified subgroup analysis of Analysis 2 restricted to patients receiving combination biologic + conventional therapy versus conventional therapy alone (n = 3653 each) was also conducted. We used time-to-event analyses to identify incidence of systemic complications.
Main Outcome Measures:
Incidence of serious infections, hematologic cytopenias, heart failure, thromboembolic events, diabetes mellitus, malignancy, psychiatric illness, all-cause hospitalization, and all-cause mortality.
Results:
After propensity score matching, cohorts were balanced on all measured covariates (all standardized mean differences [SMDs] <0.1). Compared with no systemic therapy, biologic treatment was associated with higher 5-year risks of serious infections, including pneumonia (hazard ratio [HR], 1.41, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20-1.67), sepsis (HR, 1.43, 95% CI, 1.16-1.77), and hematologic cytopenias (HR, 1.58, 95% CI, 1.44-1.74), representing 5-year Kaplan-Meier-estimated cumulative incidences of 6.43%, 3.87%, and 30.12%, respectively, in biologic-treated patients. Risks of heart failure, thromboembolic events, psychiatric illness, diabetes, and all-cause mortality did not significantly differ between groups. When compared with conventional immunomodulatory therapy, biologic treatment demonstrated a largely comparable 5-year safety profile, with the primary exceptions of higher rates of hematologic cytopenias (HR, 1.28, 95% CI, 1.16-1.41), psychiatric illness (HR, 1.13, 95% CI, 1.01-1.27), and hospitalization (HR, 1.20, 95% CI, 1.07-1.35).
Conclusions:
In patients with NIU, systemic biologic therapy was associated with higher risks of serious infections and hematologic cytopenias compared with no systemic treatment, while demonstrating a 5-year safety profile broadly comparable to conventional immunomodulatory therapy. These findings support guideline-concordant stepwise immunosuppression and underscore the importance of individualized risk assessment, infection surveillance, and hematologic monitoring for patients requiring systemic therapy.
Financial Disclosure(S):
Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
Related Concept Videos
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers
Glaucoma: Overview
Drug Products: Biologics, Biosimilars and Interchangeables