Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
Who Rules? Support Coalitions and Regime Survival, 1789-2020
Carl Henrik Knutsen1, Sirianne Dahlum1, Magnus Bergli Rasmussen2
1University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Abstract:
All political regimes rely on coalitions of supporters to govern and remain in power. We discuss, specify, and test arguments pertaining to how the numerical size as well as social diversity of regime support coalitions influence regime longevity. We use recently collected data on support coalition characteristics, with global coverage and time series exceeding 230 years, and find that larger as well as more diverse regime support coalitions are positively related to regime longevity. Both patterns hold up in different time periods and in sub-samples including only autocratic regimes. We also discuss and find indications that increased coalition size may limit certain types of regime breakdown (e.g., from popular uprisings) but not others (e.g., coups). Coalition diversity is negatively related to different types of regime breakdown, and these patterns may reflect that diverse coalitions offer regimes access to variegated power resources that enable them to mitigate different threats.
Related Concept Videos
Conservative Forces
Conservative Forces
Conservative forces are forces that are dependent only on the initial and final positions of an object and that are independent of the path that the object takes between these positions. These forces conserve energy, which means that the work done by the force is independent of the path...
Relationship Formation
Global Regulatory Systems
Conditions of Equilibrium
Internal forces are not considered for conditions of equilibrium because they occur in equal and opposite pairs within the body, effectively canceling each other. As a result,...
Impact of Groups on Groups