Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026
Multi-modal Pulmonary Imaging: Using Complementary Information from CT and Hyperpolarized 129Xe MRI to Evaluate Lung Structure-Function
Published on: April 12, 2024
RadiolGAN: Multicenter Feasibility Study of Synthetic CT From 3D Ultra-Short Echo Time MRI for Enhanced Pulmonary
Xi Zhu1,2, Wei Xia1, Xiaoliang Xie3
1Department of Radiology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Background:
Chest CT requires breath-holding and ionizing radiation. 3D ultrashort echo time (UTE) MRI allows radiation-free imaging, but the image quality is suboptimal.
Purpose:
To develop RadiolGAN and evaluate synthetic CT (sCT) from 3D UTE MRI for enhanced pulmonary visualization.
Study Type:
Prospective multicenter study.
Population:
Three hundred and fifty-nine subjects (167 women, 192 men; 52 ± 19 years) from four centers: 244 training, 61 internal test, and 54 external test.
Field Strength/Sequence:
3 T, 3D UTE gradient-echo sequence.
Assessment:
Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), noise, peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), mean structural similarity index (MS-SSIM), universal quality index (UQI), and learned perceptual image patch similarity (LPIPS). Three radiologists rated pulmonary structures (bronchi, vessels, fissures, artifacts, diagnostic confidence) and radiologic signs (nodules/masses, ground-glass opacities, patchy shadows/consolidation, emphysema/bullae, bronchiectasis) on a 5-point Likert scale.
Statistical Testing:
Repeated-measures ANOVA, paired t-tests, and Friedman tests; p < 0.05 significant.
Results:
In the external test set, RadiolGAN-CT showed higher SNR (32.63 ± 1.21 vs. 26.07 ± 1.53) and CNR (25.36 ± 1.06 vs. 21.64 ± 1.32), and lower noise (15.74 ± 0.85 vs. 19.66 ± 1.01) than 3D UTE. Versus CycleGAN-CT, RadiolGAN-CT achieved higher PSNR (65.32 ± 0.19 vs. 64.68 ± 0.21), MS-SSIM (0.912 ± 0.004 vs. 0.892 ± 0.004), FSIM (0.808 ± 0.007 vs. 0.783 ± 0.006), and UQI (0.854 ± 0.007 vs. 0.843 ± 0.007), and lower LPIPS (0.221 ± 0.010 vs. 0.236 ± 0.009). No differences were found between RadiolGAN-CT and CycleGAN-CT in SNR (p = 0.612), CNR (p = 0.547), or noise (p = 0.595). Diagnostic confidence was higher for RadiolGAN-CT (3.98 ± 1.09) than CycleGAN-CT (3.59 ± 1.06) and 3D UTE (2.84 ± 1.30). Ground-glass opacity depiction did not differ between RadiolGAN-CT and CycleGAN-CT (p = 0.903).
Data Conclusion:
RadiolGAN enables high-fidelity sCT from 3D UTE, improving structural depiction and perceptual similarity.
Evidence Level:
1.
Technical Efficacy:
2.
