Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

07:03
Evaluation of Hemisphere Lateralization with Bilateral Local Field Potential Recording in Secondary Motor Cortex of Mice
Published on: July 31, 2019
Exploring Hemispheric Vulnerability in Crossed Cerebellar Diaschisis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Annakarina Mundorf1, Christian Stratmann1,2, Ryan Adzaho1,3
1Institute for Systems Medicine and Department of Human Medicine, MSH Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Behavioural Neurology
|July 11, 2026
Summary
Crossed cerebellar diaschisis (CCD) shows no preference for the left or right cerebellar hemisphere. Further research is needed to understand potential hemispheric patterns and their clinical relevance in crossed cerebellar diaschisis.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Neurology
- Radiology
Background:
- The cerebellum plays a key role in motor, cognitive, and affective functions.
- Crossed cerebellar diaschisis (CCD) involves reduced cerebellar activity contralateral to a supratentorial lesion, leading to functional deficits.
- Understanding lesion lateralization and its impact on CCD hemispheric distribution is crucial for clinical relevance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze the distribution of crossed cerebellar diaschisis (CCD) between cerebellar hemispheres.
- To estimate the pooled proportion of left-sided CCD and assess potential hemispheric laterality.
- To evaluate the clinical relevance of hemispheric involvement in CCD.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and EBSCO databases.
- Seventeen studies with 328 patients diagnosed with CCD via neuroimaging were included in a random-effects proportion meta-analysis.
- Statistical heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed using standard methods (Cochran's Q, I², Egger's regression test).
Main Results:
- The meta-analysis revealed a pooled proportion of 0.45 for left-sided CCD (95% CI: 0.39-0.51), indicating no significant hemispheric preference.
- Low statistical heterogeneity was observed (I² = 0.0%), though moderate heterogeneity could not be entirely excluded.
- No statistically significant publication bias was detected, but the small sample size limited statistical power.
Conclusions:
- This meta-analysis found no evidence supporting a preferential distribution of crossed cerebellar diaschisis (CCD) between cerebellar hemispheres.
- Moderate variability exists across studies, highlighting the need for larger, more homogeneous investigations.
- Further well-powered research is essential to clarify potential hemispheric patterns in CCD and their clinical significance.

