Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

09:30
Tissue Characterization after a New Disaggregation Method for Skin Micro-Grafts Generation
Published on: March 4, 2016
Nanofiber Matrix Dressing for Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites: A Randomized Comparative Clinical Study
Maciej Biskupski1, Sergey Antonov1, Zofia Małgorzata Górecka1
1Department of Plastic, Reconstructive Surgery and Microsurgery, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Nanotechnology, Science and Applications
|July 13, 2026
Summary
A novel nanofiber matrix dressing significantly reduced pain and accelerated healing for split-thickness skin graft donor sites compared to traditional methods. This wound management approach shows promise for improving patient recovery and outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials Science
- Wound Healing
- Regenerative Medicine
Background:
- Donor-site morbidity, particularly pain, is a significant concern following split-thickness skin graft (STSG) harvest.
- Electrospun nanofiber matrices offer a promising wound management strategy, but clinical data for STSG donor sites are limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical efficacy of a nanofiber matrix for managing STSG donor sites.
- To compare pain, healing time, and scar outcomes between nanofiber matrix dressing and conventional dressings.
Main Methods:
- A single-center randomized comparative study involving 40 adult patients undergoing STSG harvest.
- Patients were assigned to either a nanofiber matrix group (n=20) or a conventional dressing group (n=20).
- Pain intensity, healing time, pruritus, and scar characteristics were assessed postoperatively.
Main Results:
- The nanofiber matrix significantly reduced donor-site pain on postoperative days 1, 2, and 5 compared to conventional dressings (p<0.001, p<0.001, p=0.015).
- Donor sites in the nanofiber group healed faster (15.05±2.34 days) than in the control group (18.15±4.38 days; p=0.045).
- No significant differences were observed in pruritus, late scar hyperpigmentation, scar elevation, or infection rates between the groups.
Conclusions:
- Nanofiber matrix dressing effectively reduces early postoperative pain and shortens healing time for STSG donor sites.
- Late scar outcomes and short-term safety were comparable to conventional dressings.
- Nanofiber-based donor-site management represents a clinically relevant application of electrospinning technology.

