Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Laparoscopic Repair of Para-Esophageal Hernia Using Absorbable Biosynthetic Mesh
Published on: September 11, 2021
Single-Incision Laparoscopic Hartmann's Reversal Using the Stoma Site in a Patient with Perioperative Anaphylaxis
Tsubasa Yanagihara1, Ryohei Shoji1, Yusuke Yoshida1
1Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Okayama, Japan.
Introduction:
Reversal of Hartmann's procedure is associated with substantial morbidity, and further reduction of surgical invasiveness may be beneficial in selected patients. Perioperative anaphylaxis caused by anesthetic agents or skin antiseptics poses a significant challenge to surgical management. We report a case of stoma-site single-incision laparoscopic Hartmann's reversal (HR) performed in a patient with severe perioperative allergies.
Case Presentation:
A 73-year-old woman underwent an emergency open Hartmann's procedure with partial cystectomy for perforated sigmoid colon cancer with bladder invasion. After adjuvant chemotherapy, she developed a progressively enlarging giant parastomal hernia that significantly impaired daily activities. Two attempts at HR were aborted because of perioperative anaphylactic shock. Subsequent allergy evaluations suggested rocuronium and chlorhexidine as causative agents, and povidone-iodine was also avoided based on clinical history. Approximately 14 months after the initial surgery, single-incision laparoscopic HR using the stoma site was successfully performed under general anesthesia without neuromuscular blocking agents. Preoperative skin antisepsis was performed using benzalkonium chloride, avoiding both chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine. No additional abdominal incisions were required. The operative time was 2 h 56 min, with minimal blood loss. The postoperative course was uneventful and she was discharged on POD 9.
Conclusions:
Stoma-site single-incision laparoscopic HR may represent a useful surgical option for selected patients with severe perioperative allergies to anesthetic agents and skin antiseptics, in whom minimizing abdominal approach and wound-related risks is particularly important.

