Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Building Up a High-throughput Screening Platform to Assess the Heterogeneity of HER2 Gene Amplification in Breast Cancers
Published on: December 5, 2017
Hermione Exchange Educational Program: How to Integrate Multidisciplinary Approaches to Manage HR+/HER2- Metastatic
Marina Elena Cazzaniga1,2, Nicola Fusco3,4, Alessandra Fabi5
1Phase 1 Research Unit, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy.
Managing luminal breast cancer recurrence after CDK4/6 inhibitors requires careful consideration of metastasis site and patient factors. Genomic testing and integrated molecular knowledge are crucial for optimizing second-line treatment strategies.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Medical Education
- Translational Research
Background:
- Luminal breast cancer treatment complexity necessitates clear management strategies for disease recurrence.
- Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors are standard first-line therapy, with progression requiring optimized subsequent treatment.
- Understanding treatment decisions post-CDK4/6 inhibitor progression is vital for clinical practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize clinical decision-making regarding second-line treatment after CDK4/6 inhibitor progression in luminal breast cancer.
- To assess the influence of metastasis site, patient factors, and molecular status on treatment choices.
- To highlight the importance of genomic testing and multidisciplinary collaboration in managing advanced breast cancer.
Main Methods:
- An educational program (Hermione Exchange) involving lectures and workshops was conducted.
- Two questionnaires assessed oncologists' approaches to targeted therapy versus chemotherapy after CDK4/6 inhibitor progression.
- Case studies illustrated patient scenarios with different progression patterns.
Main Results:
- Liver metastases (69%) and lung metastases (50%) strongly influenced the decision to initiate chemotherapy.
- Patient chemotherapy willingness (88%) and comorbidities (81%) were significant drivers for treatment selection.
- Duration of response, molecular status, and patient condition are key factors for second-line therapy decisions.
Conclusions:
- Genomic testing at diagnosis and during treatment is recommended for monitoring disease and guiding therapy.
- Integrating clinical experience with evolving molecular insights is essential for optimal patient management.
- Multidisciplinary collaboration among oncologists, pathologists, and molecular biologists is key to personalized treatment selection.
Related Concept Videos
International Nursing Organizations II
The WHO provides expert team support, including funding, vaccines, testing, and treatment tools at the country level to fight...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-I
Physicians
The physician's primary responsibility is to diagnose illness and direct the medical or surgical treatment of the condition. The authority to admit patients to a healthcare agency or institution and practice care within that setting is granted to physicians by the healthcare agency or institution itself.
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-II
Physical Therapist
A physical therapist (PT) aims to restore function or prevent additional impairment in a patient following an injury or disease. Massage, heat, cold, water, sonar waves, exercises, and electrical stimulation are some treatments used by PTs to treat...
Treatment Resistent Cancers
