Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
Published on: January 24, 2020
Age-based stereotype threat mechanisms: Evidence from a working-memory task
Sarah J Barber1, Caroline McDonald1, Kehinde Akintola1
1Department of Psychology, Georgia State University.
Age-based stereotype threat (ABST) impairs older adults' cognitive performance by increasing errors, specifically omissions, rather than affecting response speed or decision caution. This finding offers insights into how ageist stereotypes impact older adults' task execution.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Gerontology
Background:
- Age-based stereotype threat (ABST) is a phenomenon where older adults fear negative judgment based on ageist stereotypes.
- ABST can negatively affect cognitive performance, but the precise mechanisms are not fully understood.
- Two main theories, the integrated process model and the regulatory focus account, offer competing explanations for ABST's effects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the cognitive mechanisms underlying age-based stereotype threat in older adults.
- To differentiate between the predictions of the integrated process model and the regulatory focus account regarding ABST's impact on cognitive tasks.
- To examine how ABST influences working memory, arousal, affect, self-monitoring, and decision-making parameters.
Main Methods:
- Older adults performed a 2-back working memory task under either control or ABST-inducing conditions.
- Performance metrics included hit rates, omission errors, response times, false alarms, and drift diffusion model parameters (drift rate, boundary separation).
- Practice-related gains in performance were analyzed to assess learning and adaptation under different threat conditions.
Main Results:
- Participants under ABST conditions showed reduced practice-related improvements in hit rates compared to controls.
- A significant increase in omission errors was observed in the ABST condition.
- No significant effects of ABST were found on response times, false alarms, drift rates, or boundary separation.
Conclusions:
- The findings partially support the regulatory focus account by showing increased omissions, but ABST did not consistently lead to more cautious responding.
- The observed increase in omissions may also indicate reduced working memory efficiency under ABST.
- ABST can impair correct responding in older adults through mechanisms that do not necessarily alter fundamental decision-making parameters.
Related Concept Videos
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Working Memory
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
Role of Amygdala in Memory
One of the...
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...

