Factors associated with procedural difficulty and major adverse events during transcatheter closure of the patent ductus arteriosus
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Closure of a Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO): An Intervention Sequence
Published on: December 23, 2022
Araya Tipsungnoen1, Jirayut Jarutach1, Supaporn Roymanee1
1Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Insights
Transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is safe, but larger PDA diameter, longer length, and non-conical shape increase procedural difficulty and adverse events. Detailed anatomical assessment is crucial for successful transcatheter PDA closure.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Transcatheter closure is a common alternative to surgical ligation for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA).
- While generally safe, understanding factors contributing to procedural difficulty is important for optimizing outcomes.
- Major complications are infrequent, but technical challenges can arise.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify clinical and anatomical risk factors for procedural difficulty or major adverse events during transcatheter PDA closure.
- To document the prevalence and types of complications in a large cohort.
- To improve patient selection and procedural planning for transcatheter PDA closure.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 341 patients undergoing transcatheter PDA closure (2010-2023).
- Composite primary outcome: procedural difficulty or major adverse events (device issues, hemodynamic instability, surgical conversion).
- Multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify independent predictors of the composite outcome.
Main Results:
- Procedural difficulty or major adverse events occurred in 14.3% of patients; no procedure-related mortality.
- Independent predictors of adverse events included minimum PDA diameter >5 mm (OR 2.75), PDA length >8 mm (OR 2.81), and non-conical duct morphology (OR 2.88).
- Device embolization occurred in 0.8%, requiring surgical ligation.
Conclusions:
- Larger PDA diameter, longer ductal length, and non-conical morphology are significantly associated with increased procedural difficulty and adverse events.
- These anatomical factors are critical for risk stratification and planning transcatheter PDA closure.
- Detailed pre-procedural anatomical assessment is essential for optimizing safety and efficacy.
Abstract:
Transcatheter closure of the patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is widely accepted as an alternative to surgical ligation. However, major complications are uncommon. Therefore, procedural difficulty, including device repositioning or change, may provide additional insight into technical challenges encountered during PDA closure. We aimed to identify the clinical and anatomical risk factors associated with procedural difficulty or major adverse events during transcatheter PDA closure and to document the prevalence and types of complications encountered in a single tertiary center. This retrospective cohort study included 341 patients who underwent a transcatheter PDA closure between 2010 and 2023. A composite primary outcome, defined as procedural difficulty or major adverse events, included device malposition requiring reposition or change, unsuccessful device deployment, device embolization, hemodynamic instability requiring intervention, or unplanned surgical conversion. Demographic, anatomical, and hemodynamic variables were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors. Procedural difficulty or major adverse events occurred in 49 patients (14.3%). There was no procedure-related mortality. Device embolization occurred in three patients (0.8%), all requiring surgical ligation. Multivariate analysis revealed that a minimum PDA diameter >5 mm (odds ratio [OR] = 2.75, P = 0.013), PDA length >8 mm (OR = 2.81, P = 0.009), and non-type A (non-conical) duct morphology (OR = 2.88, P = 0.025) were independently associated with the composite outcome. In conclusion, larger PDA diameter, longer ductal length, and non-conical morphology were significantly associated with increased procedural difficulty or major adverse events during transcatheter PDA closure. These findings highlight the importance of detailed anatomical assessment in patients undergoing transcatheter PDA closure.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care

