Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
Published on: March 1, 2022
Adjoint sensitivity analysis of nonstandard objective functions
Wee Hao Ng1, Christopher R Myers1, Scott H McArt1
1Cornell University, Ithaca, 14853, New York, USA.
Adjoint sensitivity analysis (ASA) can now handle more objective functions beyond the standard Bolza form. This advanced method is applicable to non-Bolza objectives like peak values and first passage times in dynamic models.
Area of Science:
- Computational Science
- Mathematical Modeling
- Dynamic Systems Analysis
Background:
- Adjoint sensitivity analysis (ASA) is widely used for parameter estimation and optimal control in dynamic models.
- Standard ASA typically requires objective functions to be of the Bolza form (sum of running and terminal costs).
- Time-dependent sensitivity analysis (TDSA) analyzes sensitivities to time-limited perturbations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To extend the applicability of Adjoint sensitivity analysis (ASA) to non-Bolza objective functions.
- To demonstrate that non-Bolza objectives can be reformulated as equivalent Bolza objectives for ASA.
- To showcase the utility of the extended ASA in practical dynamic modeling scenarios.
Main Methods:
- Developed a method to relax the Bolza form assumption in Adjoint sensitivity analysis.
- Showcased the equivalence of sensitivities between non-Bolza and reformulated Bolza objectives.
- Applied the extended ASA to Time-dependent sensitivity analysis (TDSA) problems.
Main Results:
- Successfully demonstrated that Adjoint sensitivity analysis can be applied to non-Bolza objective functions.
- Identified practical non-Bolza objectives, such as extremum objectives (e.g., peak infections) and first passage times (e.g., population thresholds).
- Showed that these non-standard objectives can be replaced by equivalent Bolza objectives for sensitivity calculation.
Conclusions:
- The Adjoint sensitivity analysis framework is more versatile than previously assumed, accommodating a broader range of objective functions.
- This extension enables more accurate and efficient sensitivity analysis for complex dynamic models with non-standard objectives.
- The approach is validated through applications in epidemic modeling, fishery dynamics, and invasive species spread.
Related Concept Videos
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
Lagrange Multipliers: Two Constraints
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Lagrange Multipliers: Problem Solving
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation
On...

